This patch is needed at FreeBSD/OpenBSD of very recent
	versions, possibly also at UnixWare  (systems with  getifaddrs()
	library function.)

This email arrived just minutes after I had made 2.99.54-patch1 diff file.
However, this should still apply cleanly on top of that patch.

Oh yes, *if* you have IPv6 support activated, then this is not complete
patch, and needs couple more  sa.sa_family  ->  sa_family  change instances.
They will be obvious, have no fear.

	/Matti Aarnio


Date:	Tue, 14 Nov 2000 18:09:00 +0300
From:	"Andrew P. Kokarev" <llong@ivly.rbc.ru>
To:	zmailer@nic.funet.fi
Subject: sockaddr patch to compile current Zmailer for FreeBSD/OpenBSD
Message-ID: <20001114180900.A78543@ivly.rbc.ru>

I had to apply the following patch to compile the last few releases 
and current CVS Zmailer for both FreeBSD 4.2-BETA and OpenBSD 2.7.
Otherwise I'm getting "structure has no member sa" messages from cc. 


diff -ru zmailer.dist/lib/selfaddrs.c zmailer/lib/selfaddrs.c
--- zmailer.dist/lib/selfaddrs.c	Sun Nov 12 20:04:19 2000
+++ zmailer/lib/selfaddrs.c	Tue Nov 14 16:30:51 2000
@@ -142,7 +142,7 @@
 		return -5; /* UAARGH! */
 	      }
 
-	      if (sa->sa.sa_family == AF_INET) {
+	      if (sa->sa_family == AF_INET) {
 		struct sockaddr_in *si4 = (void*)malloc(sizeof(*si4));
 		if (si4 == NULL)
 		  break;
diff -ru zmailer.dist/lib/zgetifaddress.c zmailer/lib/zgetifaddress.c
--- zmailer.dist/lib/zgetifaddress.c	Sun Nov 12 20:04:19 2000
+++ zmailer/lib/zgetifaddress.c	Tue Nov 14 16:31:26 2000
@@ -121,10 +121,10 @@
 
 	      /* We have matching name, do we have matching AF ?? */
 
-	      if (sa->sa.sa_family != af)
+	      if (sa->sa_family != af)
 		continue; /* Nope.. */
 
-	      if (sa->sa.sa_family == AF_INET) {
+	      if (sa->sa_family == AF_INET) {
 		struct sockaddr_in *si4 = (void*)sap;
 
 		if (si4 == NULL) break; /* Bad param! */