 7-Apr-89 18:03:32-GMT,912;000000000013
Return-Path: <sayuri@sumex-aim.stanford.edu>
Received: by sumex-aim.stanford.edu (4.0/inc-1.0)
	id AA23278; Fri, 7 Apr 89 11:03:31 PDT
Full-Name: Sayuri Nishimura
Date: Fri, 7 Apr 1989 11:03:30 PDT
From: Sayuri Nishimura <sayuri@sumex-aim.stanford.edu>
To: Bill Yeager <yeager@sumex-aim.stanford.edu>
Subject: Re: Hi 
In-Reply-To: Your message of Thu, 6 Apr 1989 11:15:10 PDT 
Message-Id: <CMM.0.88.607975410.sayuri@sumex-aim.stanford.edu>

Bill, 
I tried the experiment you told me with a file of 197,198 bytes which 
was the biggest I could find at hand.  I can try it again with a bigger
file, but here is the result for your information.

Sumex    -> Explorer  26sec (7.5 Kbytes/sec)
Knife    -> Explorer  24.50sec (7.9 Kbytes/sec)
Explorer -> Explorer  ~10sec (approximate)

It looks to me that the network performance between Sumex and Knife for
an explorer is comparable. Is it what you expected?
sayuri

