




From: Nick Robinson <nick@CHEESYPEAS.DEMON.CO.UK>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 1998 09:03:10 +0100
Subject: Re: Freehand 5 queries

David Foulds <fe320473@CR10M.STAFFS.AC.UK> sez

>2) Is there a way to delete a point from a shape?  Say you have a
>   square, and want to remove one of the corners to create a triangle,
>   can it be done?

Click on the point with the pointer tool (!) (or alt+any other tool) to
select it, then press (gasp) delete.

>3) Conversly, is there a method of adding extra waypoints to a shape?

Use the bezigon or pen tool, click on a selected line. The help file
says alt-click for a curve point, but I can't get that to work unless I
go to the inspector & click curve & automatic...

Enclosed a first effort...

[ attachment deleted ]

all the best,

Nick Robinson

email           nick@cheesypeas.demon.co.uk
homepage        http://www.cheesypeas.demon.co.uk - all new look!
BOS homepage    http://www.rpmrecords.co.uk/bos/
RPM homepage    http://www.rpmrecords.co.uk - now with RealAudio clips!





From: Nick Robinson <nick@CHEESYPEAS.DEMON.CO.UK>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 1998 09:04:05 +0100
Subject: Re: Free copy of Freehand 5

Joseph Wu <josephwu@ULTRANET.CA> sez

>400GBP sounds a bit excessive. Freehand is now up to version 8 and I got it
>for something like US$350.

400 was for the earlier version - V8 costs us 587UKP!!!

all the best,

Nick Robinson

email           nick@cheesypeas.demon.co.uk
homepage        http://www.cheesypeas.demon.co.uk - all new look!
BOS homepage    http://www.rpmrecords.co.uk/bos/
RPM homepage    http://www.rpmrecords.co.uk - now with RealAudio clips!





From: Dominic <dom@DIMENSION3.NET>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 1998 09:08:39 -0400
Subject: I want to go to the convention!

9:00 thursday morning. I just figured out I had time to finish most of my
homework tomorow and make it to the convention this weekend (there is a
special on a Montreal-New-York flight for 174$). I have a few questions
some of you might help me answer:

- Where do I register ?
- What's the schedule ?
- does anyone know about cheap accomodations ?

I Hope I make it !

Dominic Beauchamp.





From: Dominic <dom@DIMENSION3.NET>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 1998 09:26:49 -0400
Subject: I want to go to the convention!

9:00 thursday morning. I just figured out I had time to finish most of my
homework tomorow and make it to the convention this weekend (there is a
special on a Montreal-New-York flight for 174$). I have a few questions
some of you might help me answer:

- Where do I register ?
- What's the schedule ?
- does anyone know about cheap accomodations ?
- What happens if I arrive saturday?

I Hope I make it !

Dominic Beauchamp.





From: Carlos Alberto Furuti <furuti@AHAND.UNICAMP.BR>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 1998 11:32:53 -0300
Subject: Netiquette PLEASE!

Until someone creates a FAQ for this list, would the members
please have in mind that:
- net bandwidth is scarce
- some people directly pay per line of received mail; most pay
  indirectly due to communication/modem/provider/phone company time tolls
- most readers have not time or patience for perusing lots of
  received (sometimes junk) mail
- several providers limit the mailbox size; if the owner receives too many
  large messages the mailbox discards any further postings

So, please
- when replying and quoting a previous message please take a little effort
  to *cut off unnecessary parts*. We receive a lot of long quotes followed
  by a single line like "me too!" or "I agree"
- use meaningful subjects---"help" does not help too much :), be more
  specific. A busy reader will likely discard any messages whose subject
  does not catch his/her attention and interest.  And please change the
  subject when replying but starting a new interesting thread
- do *not* send attachments, several mail readers (the programs, not the
  users) do not understand them correctly.
- do *not* send attached images

Of course this does not apply to message posted to particular list members;
if you want to make an image public, just tell the list it's available
in a web/ftp site, or announce it and send it just to those who ask you.

I hate spending more bandwidth with matters which should be obvious, but
I wish only a better and more effective channel for sharing origami.

        Sincerely,
                Carlos
        furuti@ahand.unicamp.br www.ahand.unicamp.br/~furuti





From: Garrett Alley <garrett@INFOSPACE-INC.COM>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 1998 13:23:30 -0700
Subject: Flower/Rose from a dollar?

Hello,

A coworker is getting married next month, and I've been asked for an origami
     flower of some sort to make out of dollar bills as part of the office gift
     -- the simpler the better. I've looked around on the internet, but I
     haven't had any luck in finding a

So, I'm bringing my question to the list, hoping that someone can point me to
     some diagrams on the web or the name of a good book.

Thanks!

-g-





From: Eric Eros <eros@MOHAWK.ENGR.SGI.COM>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 1998 13:43:57 -0700
Subject: Re: Flower/Rose from a dollar?

Garrett,
        I've only looked in the Origami USA Model Index, but I found:

Corsage by Angela Scharr (Simple, uses book base)
Folding Money II by Samuel Randlett, (ed) page 80
Paper used is 3x7 money

--
Eric Eros





From: Eric Eros <eros@MOHAWK.ENGR.SGI.COM>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 1998 13:58:54 -0700
Subject: Re: Flower/Rose from a dollar?

Garrett,
        There are several money-fold books at Kinokuniya, in SF.  If San
Jose is closer you could call the store there and ask them if they
have money-fold books.
        The book I've got out from the San Bernardino library has an
intermediate flower.  It has five simple petals (color-changed), two simple
leaves, and a simple stem--all from a square.  If made from a bill, the
only thing that would change would be that the stem and leaves would be
longer (the geometry of petals in a flower only changes, when the ratio
of the sides of the rectangle changes, if the petals are the only part
of the flower that will be folded).  In other words, any model that makes
the stem and the petals, both, using a square, will also work with money.

--
Eric Eros





From: Garrett Alley <garrett@INFOSPACE-INC.COM>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 1998 14:16:21 -0700
Subject: Re: Flower/Rose from a dollar?

Hmmm... That's strange, I missed that one. I guess I sort of glossed over
     'corsage'.

Thanks! Now I need to get ahold of that book. Amazon doesn't list it. I'll try
     the library.

Thanks again!

-g-

Way back when (At 01:43 PM 6/25/98 -0700), Eric Eros sent me this:
>Garrett,
>        I've only looked in the Origami USA Model Index, but I found:
>
>Corsage by Angela Scharr (Simple, uses book base)
>Folding Money II by Samuel Randlett, (ed) page 80
>Paper used is 3x7 money
>
>--
>Eric Eros





From: Garrett Alley <garrett@INFOSPACE-INC.COM>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 1998 14:23:06 -0700
Subject: Re: Flower/Rose from a dollar?

Yeah, the thing is, I really need a kinder, simpler model, since I will only be
     making some of the flowers. The person who hatched this scheme wants to do
     most of the folding...

Certainly I need to visit the library...

Thanks!

-g-

Way back when (At 01:58 PM 6/25/98 -0700), Eric Eros sent me this:
>Garrett,
>        There are several money-fold books at Kinokuniya, in SF.  If San
>Jose is closer you could call the store there and ask them if they
>have money-fold books.
>        The book I've got out from the San Bernardino library has an
>intermediate flower.  It has five simple petals (color-changed), two simple
>leaves, and a simple stem--all from a square.  If made from a bill, the
>only thing that would change would be that the stem and leaves would be
>longer (the geometry of petals in a flower only changes, when the ratio
>of the sides of the rectangle changes, if the petals are the only part
>of the flower that will be folded).  In other words, any model that makes
>the stem and the petals, both, using a square, will also work with money.
>
>--
>Eric Eros





From: Steve Woodmansee <stevew@EMPNET.COM>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 1998 14:24:49 -0700
Subject: Sellers, etc. [LONG]

Realizing that this has been discussed at great length already, a
fundamental point has never been cleared up for me, which is how models
made from published origami diagrams differ from the following:

1.  Dress or other clothing patterns
2.  How to books (make your own porch, garage conversion, etc.)
3.  Rug, pillow, needlepoint kits, etc.

I can't imagine the people from Butterick writing an individual seamstress
to demand she stop sewing their designs.
I can't imagine the people from Sunset or whoever makes the how-to books
writing an individual family to say they object to the furniture that has
been placed on their completed porch or deck design.

I think if origami were capable of being mass produced and re-sold it might
be different, but the volume of models one person can make and sell is not
going to make or break anyone's fortunes.

I know I've flip-flopped on this issue, but this is ultimately what
remains.  And by the way, I don't sell origami at all, never have.

Just for reference sake, here is a quote from a private note sent to me
after I had some on the air discussion on this topic several weeks ago.  I
responded favorably to some arguments made by Daddy D'gou and received this
(I'm keeping it anonymous out of consideration for the sender, but you may
find it interesting all the same):

"I have been on the list for over six months and I am bored to death of
this hysterical puristanism about copyright. It's gone beyond common sense.
 Origami was never like that before. I deeply regret to have seen this list
become more and more a forum for discussing copyright laws. This is typical
American profit fever, I regret to say. There is some kind of puristanism
taken to the hysterical extreme and a lot of overheated discussions. I am
not a US citizen, and what I see is something I do not like.I see a culture
where profit is God, where the meaning of life is making a profit, and a
way is copyrighting as much as possible. I see too much of this "make a
profit or die" mentality.

I have nothing against copyright, unless is taken to the extremes, like the
US genetists team who wanted more or less to copyright the human being and
things like that. What I regret is that lack of common sense, the
hysterical fever of profit, or the puritanism fever. Pushing the limits of
what is copyrightable. Trying to put price to all things possible in life.
Trying to make a profit out of anything possible."

Don't be put off by the strong tone of the note; it was sent to me
personally, not to the entire list.  You may find my correspondent's views
to be rather extreme, but I've kept this person's note for some time now
and re-read it a few times.  It has definitely got some powerful arguments
and made me reconsider some of my views.

BOTTOM LINE:  I think we are all aware that this is ultimately going to be
decided by the individuals according to their own personal convictions.  I
imagine many will simply not voice their decisions in this forum since it
has proved to be so controversial, but will continue to sell their models
regardless.

As noted by lovely Jan Fodor, this is *very* confusing and my sentiments go
back and forth; I can definitely sympathize with all the arguments and
perspectives that have been presented throughout these discussions.

I have deep respect for all of you, from masters like Joseph, Nick,
Valerie, etc. to beginners like Julian ("Do I Get Origami?").  I sincerely
apologize in advance for anything anyone may find offensive herein - it is
not intentional.

Peace to all,

"In the paper community
flames are not wecomed..."

Steve Woodmansee
stevew@empnet.com





From: Paul & Jan Fodor <origami@ALOHA.NET>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 1998 14:38:14 -1000
Subject: Re: Problem solved! (was:Re: Sellers' . . . )

Matthias Gutfeldt wrote:
>
> You just presented a solution to the whole problem of selling origami
> jewelry. After all these alterations to the original models by using
> glue, laquer, beads, cuts, and what not, it would be fair to say your
> models are "Jan Fodor's variations of Yoshizawa designs", or even "Jan
> Fodor's designs, inspired by Yoshizawa"...
> Many creations are variations of some other models, nobody finds
> anything morally wrong about that, and most creators are even proud of
> it.
>
> Matthias "tomorrow I'll save the world" Gutfeldt
>
> Paul & Jan Fodor wrote:
> > I'm not
> > sure if he recognizes origami jewelry.  Besides gluing and lacquering, I
> > had the audacity to insert bead eyes into the frog.

Matthias,
        You always were a dear.  I wonder if Yoshizawa will comment on it?
Aloha, Jan
--
<http://www.gotomymall.com/hawaii/origami/>
Origami by Jan website...the Fodor folder





From: Valerie Vann <valerie_vann@COMPUSERVE.COM>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 1998 15:31:53 -0400
Subject: I want to go to the convention!

You must be a member of OrigamiUSA (OUSA) to attend the
Convention, although you could start your membership along
with the registration by mail application (too late for
that now). Otherwise you can only do the public exhibits.

There is also a surcharge for late registration (even
by mail), and as far as I recall, there is *NO* registration
at the door. Cheap housing was available at the convention
site, but it fills fast, and is by mail reservation only.

If this doesn't discourage you, I suggest you hop on the
OUSA web site immediately, read the Convention notes, get
the OUSA office phone number, and call them ASAP to
relate your sad tale and see if anything can be done at
this very very late date...

valerie





From: Lisa Hodsdon <Lisa_Hodsdon@HMCO.COM>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 1998 17:10:14 -0400
Subject: Re: Flower/Rose from a dollar?

-g- wrote:
>I've been asked for an origami flower of some sort to make out of
>dollar bills as part of the office gift -- the simpler the better.

How about a rosette?

The archives seem to be down, so I can't check the database for
what book it's in or the creator (if it's not traditional). All I know for
sure is that it's in a book I own, but not one I have at work & I won't
have e-mail access again until after the weekend. (NYC here I come.)

It's basically a circular "fan." Not a realistic flower, but pretty and
easy. The book I have it in use a 2 by 1 rectangle, not a bill, but you
don't have to change the folding pattern at all to make it from a US
dollar. Can't vouch for a non-US dollar, but it's worth a try.

I'll try to remember to look it up and bring in info on Tuesday in case
you haven't gotten a better answer before then.

Lisa
Lisa_Hodsdon@hmco.com





From: Lisa Hodsdon <Lisa_Hodsdon@HMCO.COM>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 1998 17:14:22 -0400
Subject: Rosette [Was Re: Flower/Rose from a dollar?]

 > I've only looked in the Origami USA Model Index, but I found:

Duh. The model index is on OUSA's site, so I don't need rugcis.

Rosette by Paul Jackson (Simple, uses pleat base)
Classic Origami by Paul Jackson page 74
Paper used is 1x2

Rosette by Paul Jackson (Simple, uses book base)
Folding Money by Paul Jackson page 44
Paper used is 3x7 money

Rosette by Paul Jackson (Moderate, uses pleating base)
Making More with Money by May Leo page 32
Paper used is 3x7 $

Thanks Eric.

Lisa
Lisa_Hodsdon@hmco.com





From: Julius Kusserow <juku@MATHEMATIK.HU-BERLIN.DE>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 1998 18:10:19 +0200
Subject: Re: Please help me identify an author/designer...
Hi Tom

On Tue, 23 Jun 1998, Tom Hill wrote:

> >
>
> Julius,
>
> I haven't had the courage to try that one, mostly since I don't own any really
> 'nice' paper. I fold almost everything out of used computer printer paper,
> which means one side has random stuff printed on it. How hard is it?
I fold it from some paperbacked foil in three colours. (5cm x5cm each),
what makes the model very firm(You can play ball with it, as long the
model don't touch the ground)
>Can you  give me any pointers?
The construction is very simple. I tried it without any thougth before.
Fold the first pentagon and add the units to complete all triangles,
finish the second pentagon and so on. All problems that arise in my
consruction, could by solved by circeling the triangles in one direction
> It's a really cool model, isn't it? >
Yes really cool, I wil try the Electra60 if I find the time.
> I just couldn't believe that there wasn't even an author/editor credited on
> the book. It was really strange. And, I didn't notice it until I got it home.
>
Yes, for any corrections : The book have the Title
"30 Origami Designs and has not even a credit on diagrammer
It contains also a model called Nesting Bird by Paul Jackson, correct me
if I wrong, and a "pig", a "3D bird", a "colourchanging bird", a "beak"
which are no traditional models without any credits

> Well, back to programming. Something's got to pay for those origami books!
>
> Fold in peace,
> Tom
> tomh@groupworks.com





From: Nick Robinson <nick@CHEESYPEAS.DEMON.CO.UK>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 1998 18:20:38 +0100
Subject: attachment apology

Bernie Cosell <bernie@FANTASYFARM.COM> sez

>So please:  no attachments, no MIME-sections, no fancy fonts, no HTML... just
>plain flat text.

Many apologies, it was intended for an individual & I hadn't realised I
was replying to him via the list. It doesn't happen often, but this one
slipped the net.

all the best,

Nick Robinson

email           nick@cheesypeas.demon.co.uk
homepage        http://www.cheesypeas.demon.co.uk - all new look!
BOS homepage    http://www.rpmrecords.co.uk/bos/
RPM homepage    http://www.rpmrecords.co.uk - now with RealAudio clips!





From: Maureen Evans <kanga@ESCAPE.CA>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 1998 20:54:33 -0400
Subject: Re: Sellers, etc. [LONG]

I have been reading the posts regarding the selling of models.  I guess I am
confused about the copyright issue.  I thought the copyright was on the
diagram.  Not the produced model.  If I find a diagram and I copy it and sell
it, that is what is in violation of the copyright.  If I find a diagram and
make a model, what I do with it is up to me.  I agree with Steve Woodmansee
regarding the patterns or how to books.  Craft sales would be gone because
there would be no crocheted blankets, cookies or "origami earrings" to buy.
How sad.

Even when we look on Joseph Wu's page of diagrams, the copyright, if  I'm
reading it correctly, says nothing about what I do with the model when I make
it, just what I can and can't do with the diagram.  Maybe I am reading it
wrong.  If so, my apologies.

I beleive that Jan Fodor should be able to sell her origami to others.  She
hasen't violated anything as far as I can see.  I even found a diagram of a
butterfly of  Akira Yoshizawa  (same one Jan makes??) on the origami-usa web
page.  There is nothing on these folding pages that says I can't do with my
model, (or the diagram for that matter), as I wish (unless I missed it).

Maybe I'm missing the point completely.  Forgive my ramblings if I am, but just
had to add my $.02 worth.

Maureen Evans
kanga@escape.ca





From: Bob Nienhuis <nienhuis@WGN.NET>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 1998 22:45:08 -0700
Subject: Re: Flower/Rose from a dollar?

>At 01:23 PM 6/25/98 -0700, you wrote:
>>Hello,
>>
>>A coworker is getting married next month, and I've been asked for an
>origami flower...
>>So, I'm bringing my question to the list, hoping that someone can point me
>to some diagrams on the web or the name of a good book.
>

Dorothy Kaplan and Rosiland Joyce both have published Rose models in the
FOCA annuals. Dorothy's three dollar rose appeared in 1989 and Rosiland's
in 1983 (I think). IMHO Dorothy's is very easy to do and quite effective.
Rosilind's is more realistic but a little harder.

I belive both Dorothy (AKA Dorigami)and Rosiland are on the list, so if you
can't find the publications, you might get the information from the creators
themselves.

Bob Nienhuis
nienhuis@wgn.net





From: Valerie Vann <valerie_vann@COMPUSERVE.COM>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 1998 23:04:39 -0400
Subject: New Fuse Book Alert

Heads up, all you fans of Tomoko Fuse, especially
box makers! Her new English language book from
 is shipping:

Fabulous Origami Boxes
Tomoko Fuse
(In English, color photos)
Japan Publications  list is US$17
ISBN 0-87040-978-6

This is not a translation of previous books.
Although the designs will be "familiar" to fans of
hers, there are lots of new twists:

Party Plates
Deeper square boxes, boxes with dome type lids
Rectangular boxes, octagons

Square boxes with 3D lilies, cranes, butterflies,
  hearts, rabbits, iris and hydrangeas incorporated
 into the folding of the lids

Nested (stacking sets) of triangular, square,
 hexagon & octagon boxes

Lots of typical nifty Fuse ways of combining materials
and colors in symetrical and asymetrical patterns

A winner.

Valerie Vann





From: Sarah Wooden <sarah@FREDART.COM>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 1998 23:27:34 -0400
Subject: Re: Flower/Rose from a dollar?

At 01:23 PM 6/25/98 -0700, you wrote:
>Hello,
>
>A coworker is getting married next month, and I've been asked for an
origami flower...
>So, I'm bringing my question to the list, hoping that someone can point me
to some diagrams on the web or the name of a good book.
>
>Thanks!
>
>-g-
>

Very spooky, I just discovered Jackson's Rosette this evening. It is quite a
charming finished design and very easy to fold. Even a novice could fold it
with minimal instruction. I posted a photo made from a dollar bill to my
site under Misc. at www.fredart.com/sarah/index.html.

It is in Classic Origami and Step by Step Origami and Papercraft (plundered
from Classic Origami) by Paul Jackson.

Good luck :)

Sarah





From: Elizabeth George <emgeorge@MSN.COM>
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 1998 00:56:02 -0400
Subject: Re: Sellers, etc. [LONG]

>Realizing that this has been discussed at great length already, a
>fundamental point has never been cleared up for me, which is how models
>made from published origami diagrams differ from the following:
>
>1.  Dress or other clothing patterns

>I can't imagine the people from Butterick writing an individual seamstress
>to demand she stop sewing their designs.

    This caught my eye because I sew alot and have, in the past, sewn quite
a bit for others, (mostly my sister-in-law, who has an insatiable clothes
habit, anyway...) I had some patterns nearby and gave a look, because I
remembered reading some sort of disclaimer at some time about this, and
wondering if the fashion police would be by to cuff me for selling to my
sister-in-law... I reasoned/rationalized that since she was paying me for my
time, and she was buying the supplies, including the pattern that possibly I
was in the clear...
    The first pattern envelope I checked was a  Vogue (owned by Butterick)
Designer pattern ( I checked several, Issey Miyake, Geoffrey Beene, Adrianne
Vittadini) these patterns state on the back "Registered Model: This pattern
is for the exclusive use of private customers. Any copying of this design
for resale of the garment in any form, with or without the name of the
couturier is strictly forbidden." I gave a cursory check on the back of
McCall's (nothing on the one I checked), Simplicity (ditto), Butterick says
"This pattern is to be used for home sewing only." and several smaller
pattern companies, (i.e. Dos de Tejas, says, "Not for commercial use.") The
lesser Vogues, under $20., (that is, not the designer ones), do not have the
restriction notice. This is that 'gray' space again, I think with the
designer patterns, you're not just buying the paper, you're buying something
the designer assumes will be recognized as something unique, a small piece
of their name/style... why else would anyone shell out $25. for an envelope
full of tissue paper?
    I'm reading all of these to mean that I can sew them for me, and I think
for others, like my sister-in-law, assuming they are paying for the
pattern... I'm also thinking that the way a problem could arise would be if
I started to make multiples of the pattern and selling the garments in some
sort of a retail situation. Now, I'm no lawyer, but this is what those
notation mean to me.
    (for whatever it's worth...)





From: Paul & Jan Fodor <origami@ALOHA.NET>
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 1998 08:19:12 -1000
Subject: Re: hysterical puristanism about copyright

Jean Jerome
>         JJ Caaaaaaaaaaaaasalongaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

I guess one has to be involved to appreciate the reasonable,
thoughtfilled, words that evolved from this often discussed subject.  I
certainly appreciate the input of so many concerned persons about the
very complicated issues of not just origami but life and human
relationships.  I suppose we could just take the easier, "I know
nothing" road but somehow I don't feel right sneaking about.

The discussion may have seemed unproductive to you, but it did resolve
at least one problem for me.  I am now in touch with Paul Jackson, a
creator whose model I will be using because of his kind permission, and
we are dealing upfront with the evil money issue.  I'm not afraid of
rejection from creators anymore, and my fears of being having to pay too
much is aleviated.  From now on, I will not bring up copyright issues.
I will be asking for creator addresses however so one to one
communication will be privately done.  However, as people already
mentioned, new people always join the group and they may have the same
concerns, not it may be about that evil, boring subject.  My sympathies
to you and the others who cannot click fast enough. (Sorry, I hate
sarcasm).         Jan
--
<http://www.gotomymall.com/hawaii/origami/>
Origami by Jan website...the Fodor folder





From: Robert Maldonado <robertma@CSUFRESNO.EDU>
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 1998 08:42:07 -0700
Subject: Help with identifying a Japanese Origami book
Howdy,

I just picked up a used Japanese origami book that has little English.
>From my description below, can anyone help identify it further?

It's paperback, 213+ pp., mostly white cover.  The cover has four
panels, upper left two red camelias with green leaves, upper right three
birds, lower left a red farmhouse and barn, lower right some buildings
with pigs.  There are arabic numbers "'67" in the title (3rd line).
What looks to be a ISBN on the back is 0076 181 6016.  On pp 210, 211 is
a list of names: Hasegawa, Kasahara, Kat, Kawahata, Miyashita, Nagahara,
Sakata, Sonobe, Takahama. There are several pages of color pictures
followed by some black and white at the front. Most of the models are
"traditional" (e.g., Hina on p 22, Sambo on p. 23).  One  of the reasons
I picked it up was b/c there were some nice masks (e.g., Indian Mask, p.
140, Destroyer mask, p. 142, Gorilla (Gollera) on p. 150.)  A rather
nice tiger head is on pp. 190-1.  There is a short Xmas section.

Any help, history, or whatever would be appreciated.

Thanks,

Robert
robert_maldonado@CSUFresno.edu

Robert D. Maldonado
Philosophy Department
CSU, Fresno
Fresno, CA 93740-0105
(209) 278-2879
(209) 278-6484 FAX
robert_maldonado@CSUFresno.edu
