Newsgroups: rec.arts.int-fiction
Path: gmd.de!xlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!spool.mu.edu!sdd.hp.com!news.cs.indiana.edu!erisande@cherry.ucs.indiana.edu
From: "Kryst the Philosopher" <erisande@cherry.ucs.indiana.edu>
Subject: Re: OASYS Extra (long)
Message-ID: <1993Aug17.221221.7636@news.cs.indiana.edu>
Organization: ARCP&D
References: <1993Aug9.135727.21350@news.cs.indiana.edu> <248v9g$ut6@msuinfo.cl.msu.edu> <1993Aug11.212939.12034@news.cs.indiana.edu> <philip.745198540@labtam>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1993 22:12:11 -0500
Lines: 14

philip@labtam.labtam.oz.au (Philip Stephens)
>Steve Dunham writes:
>
>>comma in question (the one before the `and' in a list of three or more
>>items) is optional.  
>
>  And my *Australian* dictionary says that leaving out the last comma is
>prefered (though as you say, it doesn't matter)!

	Ok, so I will get rid of the extra comma, just to leave out
some coding, and since I know that people seem to prefer it.  Thanks
for the input!
						Erin -

