Message-ID: <3ADCC161.4B602915@bellsouth.net>
From: Max F Lang <mflang@bellsouth.net>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.13 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.os.minix
Subject: Re: ACK under GPL?
References: <3AD9F1C3.6584EA1@nunnink.cjb.net> <1sdhb9.o96.ln@jetsam.cs.vu.nl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 16
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 18:19:13 -0400
NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.78.226.87
X-Trace: news3.mco 987545691 216.78.226.87 (Tue, 17 Apr 2001 18:14:51 EDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 18:14:51 EDT
Path: news.adfa.edu.au!clarion.carno.net.au!news0.optus.net.au!news1.optus.net.au!optus!news.mel.connect.com.au!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.atl.bellsouth.net.MISMATCH!newsfeed.atl!news3.mco.POSTED!not-for-mail
Xref: news.adfa.edu.au comp.os.minix:37209

Kees J Bot wrote:
> The status is unchanged.  I wanted to make it compilable under Minix
> before releasing it, but I haven't found much time to work on it.  (It's
> under a BSD-style license, by the way.)

As I wrote then, when you first announced it: you should still go ahead
and release the ACK source in whatever sort of state it's in. Frankly
I'm not worried about compiling it, or getting it to work under any
system. I'd just like to poke around the source and see how it works.
You know, play with the pieces and see how they go together.

M
-- 
All parts should go together without forcing...
By all means, do not use a hammer.
                        -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925.
