From xemacs-m  Thu Jun 19 17:34:21 1997
Received: from jagor.srce.hr (root@jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA00393
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Thu, 19 Jun 1997 17:34:19 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (from hniksic@localhost)
          by jagor.srce.hr (8.8.5/8.8.4)
	  id TAA01633; Thu, 19 Jun 1997 19:56:51 +0200 (MET DST)
To: XEmacs Developers <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>
Subject: Re: arc-mode, etc.
References: <199706190256.WAA26425@sundial.MIT.EDU> <kig205zwa8j.fsf@jagor.srce.hr> <m27mfr5ja4.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
X-Attribution: Hrv
X-Face: Mie8:rOV<\c/~z{s.X4A{!?vY7{drJ([U]0O=W/<W*SMo/Mv:58:*_y~ki>xDi&N7XG
        KV^$k0m3Oe/)'e%3=$PCR&3ITUXH,cK>]bci&<qQ>Ff%x_>1`T(+M2Gg/fgndU%k*ft
        [(7._6e0n-V%|%'[c|q:;}td$#INd+;?!-V=c8Pqf}3J
From: Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr>
Date: 19 Jun 1997 19:56:51 +0200
In-Reply-To: Steven L Baur's message of 18 Jun 1997 21:05:55 -0700
Message-ID: <kig7mfq1noc.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
Lines: 16
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.52/XEmacs 20.3(beta7)

Steven L Baur <steve@xemacs.org> writes:

> > They would, but it's considered bad taste to override standard
> > bindings.
> 
> ?  To name one example, there aren't enough lifetimes to convince me
> that the standard binding for `C-x l' is superior to `find-library'.

I wasn't arguing about superiority.  I bind `C-x C-r' to something of
my own, too.  But I do /avoid/ rebinding the standard global bindings, 
whenever I can.

-- 
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
The end of the world is coming...  SAVE YOUR BUFFERS!

