From xemacs-m  Mon Jun 16 22:30:59 1997
Received: from cnri.reston.va.us (cnri.CNRI.Reston.VA.US [132.151.1.1])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id WAA13325
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Mon, 16 Jun 1997 22:30:58 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from newcnri.CNRI.Reston.Va.US (newcnri [132.151.1.84]) by cnri.reston.va.us (8.8.5/8.7.3) with SMTPid XAA26128; Mon, 16 Jun 1997 23:34:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from anthem.CNRI.Reston.Va.US by newcnri.CNRI.Reston.Va.US (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id XAA28339; Mon, 16 Jun 1997 23:35:00 -0400
Received: by anthem.CNRI.Reston.Va.US (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id XAA15246; Mon, 16 Jun 1997 23:34:14 -0400
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 1997 23:34:14 -0400
Message-Id: <199706170334.XAA15246@anthem.CNRI.Reston.Va.US>
From: "Barry A. Warsaw" <bwarsaw@CNRI.Reston.Va.US>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr>
Cc: XEmacs Developers <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>
Subject: Re: Ebola vaccines
References: <199706112130.RAA27486@anthem.CNRI.Reston.Va.US>
	<864tb4es2d.fsf@kramer.in.aventail.com>
	<199706112300.TAA27566@anthem.CNRI.Reston.Va.US>
	<m2wwo03f9u.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
	<199706131548.LAA28785@anthem.CNRI.Reston.Va.US>
	<kigwwny4ewa.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
	<199706141905.PAA10761@anthem.CNRI.Reston.Va.US>
	<kigrae2j2wn.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
X-Mailer: VM 6.32 under 19.15p4 XEmacs Lucid
Reply-To: bwarsaw@python.org
X-Attribution: BAW
X-Oblique-Strategy: Emphasize repetitions
X-Url: http://www.python.org/~bwarsaw


>>>>> "Hrv" == Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> writes:

    Hrv> Don't confuse byte-compilation and running.  Steve fixed up
    Hrv> the warnings to not yell at the byte-compiler, but Ebola will
    Hrv> reappear whenever `following-char' (or `precefing-char')
    Hrv> returns 0.

Good point.  Well here's what I've decided to do: I am not going to
just apply a global substitution of c-a/c-b for f-c/p-c at this time.
I'd like Steve to integrate the next release[1] with the XEmacs 20
tree and then we can see exactly how many Ebola warnings you get in
practice.  I have not been seeing any during my testing, which
includes my regression suite and my recent hacking on the Python C
code.  If it's really horrible, I'll make the change, but doing it in
an Emacs 19.34 compatible way will be gross (so I either don't do
that, or delay delay delay :-)

-Barry

[1] I still have to decide what to do about the Del BS (read that how
you will :-)

