From xemacs-m  Wed Jun 11 10:12:38 1997
Received: from pallas.spacetec.no (pallas.spacetec.no [192.51.5.92])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA17442
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Wed, 11 Jun 1997 10:12:37 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (from tor@localhost)
	by pallas.spacetec.no (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA11556;
	Wed, 11 Jun 1997 17:11:59 +0200
Message-Id: <199706111511.RAA11556@pallas.spacetec.no>
From: tor@spacetec.no (Tor Arntsen)
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 1997 17:11:59 +0200
In-Reply-To: N J Doye <nic@niss.ac.uk>
       "Re: xpm version configure test" (Jun 11, 16:04)
X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.5 10/14/92)
To: N J Doye <nic@niss.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: xpm version configure test
Cc: XEmacs Beta Test <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>

>->l     0     0 ViewKit_eoe.sw.base     usr/lib/libXpm.so
>I understand what you're saying and you're right. But xpm.h is
>provided by SGI, it just hasn't been installed on your system.
>
>f  1583    30 ViewKit_dev.sw.base     usr/include/X11/xpm.h

That's because ViewKit_dev is a development kit, while ViewKit_eoe is part
of the runtime kit.  ViewKit_eoe is part of a 'normal' install and will
thus install the library without the header file. (I will usually not want
to install ViewKit_dev, it's a C++ thing which I never use.)

Tor

