From xemacs-m  Wed Jun 11 07:58:57 1997
Received: from mercury.Sun.COM (mercury.Sun.COM [192.9.25.1])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id HAA16127
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Wed, 11 Jun 1997 07:58:56 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from Eng.Sun.COM ([129.146.1.25]) by mercury.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6/mail.byaddr) with SMTP id GAA14755; Wed, 11 Jun 1997 06:18:31 -0700
Received: from kindra.eng.sun.com by Eng.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6/SMI-5.3)
	id FAA15644; Wed, 11 Jun 1997 05:57:19 -0700
Received: from xemacs.eng.sun.com by kindra.eng.sun.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id FAA17525; Wed, 11 Jun 1997 05:57:16 -0700
Received: by xemacs.eng.sun.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id FAA16589; Wed, 11 Jun 1997 05:57:18 -0700
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 1997 05:57:18 -0700
Message-Id: <199706111257.FAA16589@xemacs.eng.sun.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Martin Buchholz <mrb@Eng.Sun.COM>
To: David Bakhash <cadet@MIT.EDU>, Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr>
Cc: XEmacs Developers <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>
Subject: A newer tutorial
In-Reply-To: <199706111231.MAA13538@sundial.MIT.EDU.MIT.EDU>
References: <kigvi3lixnz.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
	<199706111231.MAA13538@sundial.MIT.EDU.MIT.EDU>
X-Mailer: VM 6.32 under 20.3 "Zagreb" XEmacs Lucid (beta5)
Reply-To: Martin Buchholz <mrb@Eng.Sun.COM>

>>>>> "David" == David Bakhash <David> writes:

David> 	I just read the new tutorial and it looks good to me.
David> Everything is synched up with XEmacs, so why not?  I'm for it.

I did the last TUTORIAL sync, and made various corrections and
preserved updates we had made to the FSF version.  So a straight
replacement might lose some of our value add.  Can't remember offhand
just what the differences were, though.  I think we had more
X-specific information.

Martin

