From xemacs-m  Sat Jun  7 01:50:58 1997
Received: from mercury.Sun.COM (mercury.Sun.COM [192.9.25.1])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id BAA21954
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Sat, 7 Jun 1997 01:50:57 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from Eng.Sun.COM ([129.146.1.25]) by mercury.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6/mail.byaddr) with SMTP id AAA28045; Sat, 7 Jun 1997 00:09:30 -0700
Received: from kindra.eng.sun.com by Eng.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6/SMI-5.3)
	id XAA25871; Fri, 6 Jun 1997 23:49:32 -0700
Received: from xemacs.eng.sun.com by kindra.eng.sun.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id XAA08994; Fri, 6 Jun 1997 23:49:28 -0700
Received: by xemacs.eng.sun.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id XAA12382; Fri, 6 Jun 1997 23:49:25 -0700
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 1997 23:49:25 -0700
Message-Id: <199706070649.XAA12382@xemacs.eng.sun.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Martin Buchholz <mrb@Eng.Sun.COM>
To: <neal@ctd.comsat.com>
Cc: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: 20.3b4 linux success (more or less)
In-Reply-To: <E0waCcL-0001bl-00@neptune.corp.comsat.com>
References: <E0waCcL-0001bl-00@neptune.corp.comsat.com>
X-Mailer: VM 6.31 under 20.3 XEmacs Lucid (beta3)
Reply-To: Martin Buchholz <mrb@Eng.Sun.COM>

>>>>> "neal" == neal  <neal@ctd.comsat.com> writes:

neal> In file included from /usr/local/src/xemacs-20.3-b4/lib-src/profile.c:39:
neal> ../src/config.h:37: warning: `alloca' redefined
neal> /usr/include/alloca.h:40: warning: this is the location of the previous definition

neal> /usr/local/src/xemacs-20.3-b4/lib-src/etags.c: In function `etags_getcwd':
neal> /usr/local/src/xemacs-20.3-b4/lib-src/etags.c:4604: warning: comparison between pointer and integer

These look suspiciously like the patch did not get completely applied, 
since I did make modifications to get the above warnings to go away.

neal> strftime.c: In function `emacs_strftime':
neal> strftime.c:367: warning: passing arg 2 of `add_str' discards `const' from pointer target type

neal> /usr/local/src/xemacs-20.3-b4/src/buffer.c:2839: the `getwd' function is dangerous and should not be used.

neal> Why are we using getwd if getcwd is available?  We should prefer the
neal> latter.

Did configure autodetect and define HAVE_GETCWD?  If not, why not?

Martin

