From xemacs-m  Fri Jun  6 18:45:22 1997
Received: from jagor.srce.hr (hniksic@jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA18759
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Fri, 6 Jun 1997 18:45:21 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (from hniksic@localhost)
          by jagor.srce.hr (8.8.5/8.8.4)
	  id BAA18260; Sat, 7 Jun 1997 01:45:22 +0200 (MET DST)
To: XEmacs Developers <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>
Subject: Re: Warsaw: SUCCESS on sparc-sun-solaris2.5
References: <kigbu5jgwdz.fsf@jagor.srce.hr> <m24tbbi9or.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
X-Attribution: Hrv
X-Face: Mie8:rOV<\c/~z{s.X4A{!?vY7{drJ([U]0O=W/<W*SMo/Mv:58:*_y~ki>xDi&N7XG
        KV^$k0m3Oe/)'e%3=$PCR&3ITUXH,cK>]bci&<qQ>Ff%x_>1`T(+M2Gg/fgndU%k*ft
        [(7._6e0n-V%|%'[c|q:;}td$#INd+;?!-V=c8Pqf}3J
From: Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr>
Date: 07 Jun 1997 01:45:21 +0200
In-Reply-To: Steven L Baur's message of 06 Jun 1997 16:38:28 -0700
Message-ID: <kigoh9j8fe6.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
Lines: 22
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.52/XEmacs 20.3(beta4)

Steven L Baur <steve@xemacs.org> writes:

> > A question: What exactly do we get with this error checking?  I
> > can't really afford the substantial slowdown in everyday work,
> > unless it offers real advantages otherwise.
> 
> If you don't have problems that you cannot trace down (and fix)
> yourself you probably do not need it.  The solution I use is to keep
> two builds around (with --srcdir), one compiled
> balls-to-the-walls-mega-optimized for day-to-day use (that's the one
> I'm typing in now) and a second copy compiled with all error
> checking, debug, etc. turned on for debugging.

That's a good idea, and that's what I'll do from now on.  However, as
an XEmacs developer, I'd still like to know what exactly I'm getting
with all the error checking.

-- 
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
Unspeakable horrors from outer space paralyze the living and
resurrect the dead!

