From xemacs-m  Sun May 18 03:12:06 1997
Received: from altair.xemacs.org (steve@xemacs.miranova.com [206.190.83.19])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id DAA00125
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Sun, 18 May 1997 03:12:05 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (from steve@localhost)
	by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id BAA02342;
	Sun, 18 May 1997 01:13:11 -0700
Mail-Copies-To: never
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: 20.3 beta 1 configure patch
References: <199705180140.UAA21913@xemacs.org>
X-Url: http://www.miranova.com/%7Esteve/
X-Face: #!T9!#9s-3o8)*uHlX{Ug[xW7E7Wr!*L46-OxqMu\xz23v|R9q}lH?cRS{rCNe^'[`^sr5"
 f8*@r4ipO6Jl!:Ccq<xoV[Qz2u8<8-+Vwf2gzJ44lf_/y9OaQ`@#Q65{U4/TC)i2`~/M&QI$X>p:9I
 OSS'2{-)-4wBnVeg0S\O4Al@)uC[pD|+
X-Attribution: sb
From: Steven L Baur <steve@xemacs.org>
In-Reply-To: Chuck Thompson's message of Sat, 17 May 1997 20:40:03 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Date: 18 May 1997 01:13:11 -0700
Message-ID: <m2n2ptfbag.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
Lines: 14
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.52/XEmacs 20.2

Chuck Thompson <cthomp@xemacs.org> writes:

sb> Question: has there ever been a beta XEmacs that Chuck
sb> couldn't compile?

> Not while I was primary maintainer.  I believe there were a few where
> the opposite was the case though :-)

You mean betas that you made that I couldn't compile (like the mid
19.14's and the Linux termcap/ncurses braindamage), or the dumping of
defface in comint that I did into a later beta?  :-)
-- 
steve@calag.com baur
Unsolicited commercial e-mail will be billed at $250/message.

