From xemacs-m  Mon May 12 01:04:45 1997
Received: from epsongw2.epson.co.jp (epsongw2.epson.co.jp [202.248.17.20])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id BAA28740
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Mon, 12 May 1997 01:04:43 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from epsongw.epson.co.jp by epsongw2.epson.co.jp (8.6.12+2.4W/3.4W-MX950731-Epson Mail Gateway) id PAA04280; Mon, 12 May 1997 15:06:28 +0900
Received: from hv.epson.co.jp by epsongw.epson.co.jp (8.6.12+2.4W/3.4W-97040115) id PAA21483; Mon, 12 May 1997 15:01:15 +0900
Received: from hv08.hv.epson.co.jp (hv08 [163.141.23.108]) by hv.epson.co.jp (8.6.12+2.5Wb7/3.3W-ESD-MAIL-GW1996/01/17) with ESMTP id PAA28536 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Mon, 12 May 1997 15:03:18 +0900
Received: (from ichikawa@localhost) by hv08.hv.epson.co.jp (8.8.2+2.6Wbeta9/3.5W-AT-ESD hv08 11/12/96) id PAA12156; Mon, 12 May 1997 15:04:10 +0900 (JST)
From: =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCO1RAbkMjOkgbKEI=?= / Tatsuya Ichikawa
 <ichikawa@hv.epson.co.jp>
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: w3/XEmacs never retruns on my system.
References: <wnk9lnl671.fsf@hv08.hv.epson.co.jp> <m2g1vwbg3z.fsf@altair.xemacs.org> <wnbu6hlbvu.fsf@hv08.hv.epson.co.jp> <86rafd4acm.fsf@kramer.in.aventail.com>
X-Emacs: XEmacs 20.2
X-MUA: gnus-mime 0.21 (for SEMI) + SEMI MIME view 0.87
Original-Sender: ichikawa@hv.epson.co.jp
Organization: Tatsuya Ichikawa Supporter Club.
X-Face-Version: X-Face utilities v1.2.5
X-Face: ?/"MXina;Tt'.c6A>P1["3Wm#HCKX-/DEGN$1y[T?I6fCGFUTh]6'<@mJ&1TSRDlc_>|Lo'
 %b|.R<f|%BIjCOSQvLV:2)P^04)ek{b"Non9NuWOEk;\0td2/ema6)OY@T[SPgNY3z[;uPIjxx>wf=
 `7~U>E@VElJ`RI\Sb1h
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI MIME-Edit 0.80)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Date: 12 May 1997 15:04:09 +0900
In-Reply-To: wmperry@aventail.com's message of 11 May 1997 20:50:49 -0700
Message-ID: <wn207dfcpy.fsf@hv08.hv.epson.co.jp>
Lines: 29
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.52/XEmacs 20.2(beta6)


>>>>> In <86rafd4acm.fsf@kramer.in.aventail.com> 
>>>>>	wmperry@aventail.com (William M. Perry) wrote:

>   I really do not think the TCP/IP stack should be returning EAGAIN in this
> situation, but then UnixWare and friends are not exactly the worlds best
> operating systems.

  Humm , That's right.

>   If this is really what is happening, try this patch.  We would need to
> wrap it in appropriate #if defined(EAGAIN) && !defined(UNIXWARE), etc.  But
> this might get you going.  It at least doesn't break anything here under
> linux.

  I Applied.

  But this patch has no effection w3/XEmacs on my system.

  I will ask same question Mr.Shogo Fujii.

  He did a little change on xemacs source code.
  I will ask him where did he changed.

-- 
Tatsuya Ichikawa : Epson Software Development Lab, Inc. Nagano, Japan. ;-)
# PGP Public Key : pgp-public-keys@keys.pgp.net(Subject: GET 0x0A2D6599)
       E-mail    : <ichikawa@hv.epson.co.jp><t-ichi@po.shiojiri.ne.jp>
end

