From xemacs-m  Fri May  9 08:09:24 1997
Received: from frege.math.ethz.ch (root@frege-d-math-north-g-west.math.ethz.ch [129.132.145.3])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id IAA25170
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Fri, 9 May 1997 08:09:14 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from midget.math.ethz.ch (vroonhof@midget [129.132.145.4]) by frege.math.ethz.ch (8.6.12/Main-STAT-mailer) with ESMTP id PAA09298 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Fri, 9 May 1997 15:08:05 +0200
Received: (vroonhof@localhost) by midget.math.ethz.ch (8.6.12/D-MATH-client) id PAA01312; Fri, 9 May 1997 15:07:26 +0200
Sender: vroonhof@math.ethz.ch
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: patch-2.2
References: <u9rafghksh.fsf@neal.ctd.comsat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: Jan Vroonhof <vroonhof@math.ethz.ch>
Date: 09 May 1997 15:07:25 +0200
In-Reply-To: Neal Becker's message of 09 May 1997 08:50:06 -0400
Message-ID: <bybu6k4wvm.fsf@midget.math.ethz.ch>
Lines: 11
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.37/XEmacs 19.15

Neal Becker <neal@ctd.comsat.com> writes:

> as always.  The patch succeeded, but there's no yyy.orig files in the
> xemacs tree.  Does patch not backup the originals by default anymore?
> That would really suck.

If I read the announcement for the lastest patch well, this is the
case. I agree it sucks, it has something to do with posix
compatibility it seems.

Jan

