From xemacs-m  Fri Dec  6 06:34:45 1996
Received: from pallas.spacetec.no (pallas.spacetec.no [192.51.5.92]) by xemacs.cs.uiuc.edu (8.8.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id GAA09938 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Fri, 6 Dec 1996 06:34:44 -0600 (CST)
Received: (from tor@localhost) by pallas.spacetec.no (8.7.1/8.7.1) id NAA00767; Fri, 6 Dec 1996 13:33:50 +0100
Message-Id: <199612061233.NAA00767@pallas.spacetec.no>
From: tor@spacetec.no (Tor Arntsen)
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 1996 13:33:50 +0100
In-Reply-To: Jareth Hein <jhod@po.iijnet.or.jp>
       "b30 woes" (Dec  6, 13:20)
X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.5 10/14/92)
To: Jareth Hein <jhod@po.iijnet.or.jp>,
        XEmacs Beta Mailing List <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>
Subject: Re: b30 woes

I haven't tested the 20. versions at all, but as you mentioned 19.13 
I'll reply anyway..
We have been using 19.12 and 19.14 (since the day 19.14 was released)
mostly on Indys and other SGIs.  These days we use IRIX 6.2.
We have only one Indigo2 though, and it runs 5.3 not 6.2.
We haven't seen any X-server problems connected to xemacs..
I'm not very fond of just starting one XEmacs copy in the morning, instead
I start them all the time.  And if I'm editing something else at the same time
I tend to start antoher xemacs instead of opening another frame.
No problems observed..

On my machines I have had X-server patch 1406 installed (may not be so good
on Indigo2 -- or was it Impact?), lately replaced with 1574.
But many of my colleagues run without any X-server patch at all and seems
to be happy.

Tor Arntsen

