From xemacs-m  Mon Apr 28 18:18:20 1997
Received: from mercury.Sun.COM (mercury.Sun.COM [192.9.25.1])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id SAA17164
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Mon, 28 Apr 1997 18:18:20 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from Corp.Sun.COM ([129.145.35.78]) by mercury.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6/mail.byaddr) with SMTP id QAA15355 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Mon, 28 Apr 1997 16:27:47 -0700
Received: from legba.Corp.Sun.COM by Corp.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6/SMI-5.3)
	id QAA10463; Mon, 28 Apr 1997 16:18:18 -0700
Received: by legba.Corp.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id QAA06336; Mon, 28 Apr 1997 16:18:15 -0700
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Brain lossage
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: Gary.Foster@Corp.Sun.COM (Gary D. Foster)
Date: 28 Apr 1997 16:18:14 -0700
Message-ID: <bciwwpmohxl.fsf@corp.Sun.COM>
Lines: 20
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.46/XEmacs 20.2(beta3)

Ok, ok, my fingers are seriously trained to use C-d instead of delete, 
but all of a sudden I noticed that the delbackspace package isn't
doing it's magic remapping anymore[1].  Sure enough, I went back to 20.1
and it didn't work there either... it's back to that old ugly behavior 
of DEL and BS doing exactly the same thing (which I /guess/ is kinda
stupid...).  Maybe I'm suffering serious brain lossage, but what do I
tell the other people around here to use instead of delbackspace.el?
They're gonna beat me if I tell them they have to use C-d and they
don't really want to go back to my exported 19.15 either.  Was there
some decision wrt DEL/BS mapping on here that I missed [2]???

-- Gary F.

Footnotes: 
[1]  Ok, ok, actually someone *ELSE* pointed it out to me... in a
     rather heated fashion, I might add...

[2]  or deleted because I didn't _personally_ give a fig and now I'm
     being punished for my sins? *sigh*

