From xemacs-m  Mon Apr 28 14:00:49 1997
Received: from canker.atype.com (jsc@canker.atype.com [137.103.200.167])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA10060
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Mon, 28 Apr 1997 14:00:48 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (from jsc@localhost)
	by canker.atype.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id PAA25735;
	Mon, 28 Apr 1997 15:00:05 -0400
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: "mailcrypt fiasco"?
References: <m2afnuf0gs.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: jsc@atype.com (Jin S. Choi)
Date: 28 Apr 1997 15:00:04 -0400
In-Reply-To: Steven L Baur's message of 23 Mar 1997 19:11:31 -0800
Message-ID: <x467x73rd7.fsf@canker.atype.com>
Lines: 9
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.46/XEmacs 20.2(beta3)

I was just doing some major catchup on my xemacs-beta reading, and I
noticed this in the xemacs 19.15-b104 announcement. I'm the original
mailcrypt author, and I was just curious, *what* mailcrypt fiasco?
Wha'happened?

Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com> writes:

> * Make sure your favorite packages are still functional (they should
>   be, but remember the mailcrypt fiasco?)

