From xemacs-m  Thu Apr 24 21:03:55 1997
Received: from ihins.ihi.co.jp (ihins.ihi.co.jp [202.248.84.130])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id VAA18086
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Thu, 24 Apr 1997 21:03:54 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from inettms.ty.ihi.co.jp ([202.248.84.135]) by ihins.ihi.co.jp (8.6.12+2.4W/3.3W9-primary) with ESMTP id LAA06891 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Fri, 25 Apr 1997 11:02:13 +0900
Received: from neptune.ritp.ye.IHI.CO.JP ([150.75.41.143]) by inettms.ty.ihi.co.jp (8.6.12+2.4W/3.3W9-primary) with ESMTP id LAA24952 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Fri, 25 Apr 1997 11:02:25 +0900
Received: from pluto.ritp.ye.IHI.CO.JP (pluto [150.75.41.82]) by neptune.ritp.ye.IHI.CO.JP (8.8.5/3.5Wbeta) with SMTP id LAA01576 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Fri, 25 Apr 1997 11:06:57 +0900 (JST)
Received: by pluto.ritp.ye.IHI.CO.JP (5.65v3.2/3.5Wpl7-pluto)
	id AA31096; Fri, 25 Apr 1997 11:04:48 +0900
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 1997 11:04:48 +0900
Message-Id: <9704250204.AA31096@pluto.ritp.ye.IHI.CO.JP>
From: UENO Fumihiro <7m2vej@ritp.ye.IHI.CO.JP>
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: Canna 3.2 or 3.5b2 ?(Re: 20.2b2 success on Linux)
In-Reply-To: <199704250138.KAA07369@Flux.tokai.jaeri.go.jp>
References: <199704250114.KAA07221@Flux.tokai.jaeri.go.jp>
	<199704250138.KAA07369@Flux.tokai.jaeri.go.jp>
X-Mailer: VM 6.27 under 20.2 XEmacs Lucid (beta2)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

>>>>> "FK" == Kazuyoshi Furutaka <furutaka@Flux.tokai.jaeri.go.jp> writes:
FK> By the way, Canna 3.2 included in JE distribution seems to be heavily

As far as I know, Canna 3.2 works well on linux box w/o patches.
#I was one of Canna beta testers on linux(and etc) those days.

I think the JE patches make things wrong. How about
trying building raw Canna 3.2 package ?

-- 
  UENO Fumihiro -- mailto:7m2vej@ritp.ye.IHI.CO.JP

