From xemacs-m  Mon Apr 21 12:36:49 1997
Received: from crystal.WonderWorks.COM (crystal.WonderWorks.com [192.203.206.1])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA25285
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Mon, 21 Apr 1997 12:36:47 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by crystal.WonderWorks.COM 
	id QQcmgk19296; Mon, 21 Apr 1997 13:36:47 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 1997 13:36:47 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <QQcmgk19296.199704211736@crystal.WonderWorks.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Kyle Jones <kyle_jones@wonderworks.com>
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: Losing a frame
In-Reply-To: <m23eskcm1f.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
References: <kighgh1frav.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
	<m2vi5hmqns.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
	<bysp0k63ym.fsf@midget.math.ethz.ch>
	<kigu3l0bpmj.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
	<m23eskcm1f.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
X-Mailer: VM 6.28 under 20.2 XEmacs Lucid (beta1)
X-Face: /cA45WHG7jWq>(O3&Z57Y<"WsX5ddc,4c#w0F*zrV#=M
        0@~@,s;b,aMtR5Sqs"+nU.z^CSFQ9t`z2>W,S,]:[+2^
        Nbf6v4g>!&,7R4Ot4Wg{&tm=WX7P["9%a)_da48-^tGy
        ,qz]Z,Zz\{E.,]'EO+F)@$KtF&V

Steven L Baur writes:
 > Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> writes:
 > 
 > > Jan Vroonhof <vroonhof@math.ethz.ch> writes:
 > 
 > >> iconify-emacs is highly inapproporate with virtual sreens anyway.
 > 
 > > I'd prefer `C-z' to be bound to `iconify-frame', anyway.  What do
 > > the others think about the usability of the current `C-z' binding in
 > > X?
 > 
 > Unusable.

It depends on how you use XEmacs.  Since keybindings are a
religious issue you should have a non-religious reason for
changing them sufficiently unassailable in its Power and
Majesty that it will kill the religious argument that will
follow.  What reason do you have that is going to kill the
argument?

