From xemacs-m  Thu Apr 10 20:50:41 1997
Received: from altair.xemacs.org (steve@xemacs.miranova.com [206.190.83.19])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA00904
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Thu, 10 Apr 1997 20:50:39 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (from steve@localhost)
	by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id TAA27515;
	Thu, 10 Apr 1997 19:03:33 -0700
Mail-Copies-To: never
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: XEmacs 20.1 beta 11 crashes on IRIX 6.2
References: <m0wEoe4-000mUTC@i.control.att.com>
X-Url: http://www.miranova.com/%7Esteve/
X-Face: #!T9!#9s-3o8)*uHlX{Ug[xW7E7Wr!*L46-OxqMu\xz23v|R9q}lH?cRS{rCNe^'[`^sr5"
 f8*@r4ipO6Jl!:Ccq<xoV[Qz2u8<8-+Vwf2gzJ44lf_/y9OaQ`@#Q65{U4/TC)i2`~/M&QI$X>p:9I
 OSS'2{-)-4wBnVeg0S\O4Al@)uC[pD|+
X-Attribution: sb
From: Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com>
In-Reply-To: lda@control.att.com's message of Wed, 9 Apr 97 00:06 EDT
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Date: 10 Apr 1997 19:03:31 -0700
Message-ID: <m2encipb7w.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
Lines: 42
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.43/XEmacs 20.1(beta14)

Larry Auton <lda@control.att.com> writes:

> I applied the patch to src-lib/Makefile.in.in that Steven Baur sent
> for my (PLAIN VANILLA FLAVORED) IRIX 6.2 host.  I then attempted to
> compile and configure like so:

> 	./configure --prefix=/usr/local/xemacs-20.1-b11
> 	make

> 	the compile failed looking for Xm/*.h

> I searched for them with ``find'' and found all of the requisite files under
> the directory /usr/include/abi so I re-configured like so:
                ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

That doesn't look very Motif-ish to me.  Are you sure that's the right 
directory?

> 	make

> and the compile completed, with a few (worrying) warnings:

> cc -g -32 -L. -L../lwlib -o temacs abbrev.o alloc.o blocktype.o [.... -lda]
> ld: WARNING 15: multiply defined:(Qdisplay_table) in faces.o and glyphs.o (2nd definition ignored).

The duplicate declaration in glyphs.c was added in beta10.  I wonder
why no one else's compiler barfed on it?

> ld: WARNING 84: /usr/lib/libmld.a is not used for resolving any symbol.
> ld: WARNING 85: definition of UP in terminfo.o preempts that definition in /usr/lib/libcurses.so.
> ld: WARNING 85: definition of BC in terminfo.o preempts that definition in /usr/lib/libcurses.so.
> ld: WARNING 85: definition of PC in terminfo.o preempts that definition in /usr/lib/libcurses.so.
> ld: WARNING 85: definition of _malloc in gmalloc.o preempts that definition in /usr/lib/libc.so.
> ld: WARNING 85: definition of _realloc in gmalloc.o preempts that definition in /usr/lib/libc.so.
> ld: WARNING 85: definition of _free in gmalloc.o preempts that definition in /usr/lib/libc.so.

Um, this looks pretty bad.  Are you sure /usr/include/abi is good
directory to be including?

-- 
steve@miranova.com baur
Unsolicited commercial e-mail will be billed at $250/message.

