From xemacs-m  Fri Dec 27 22:55:36 1996
Received: from altair.xemacs.org (steve@xemacs.miranova.com [206.190.83.19])
          by xemacs.cs.uiuc.edu (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP
	  id WAA04027 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Fri, 27 Dec 1996 22:55:35 -0600 (CST)
Received: (from steve@localhost)
          by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.4/8.8.4)
	  id VAA31232; Fri, 27 Dec 1996 21:05:05 -0800
Sender: steve@xemacs.org
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: installation problem with xemacs-19.15-b5
References: <199612231517.KAA27418@jet-sun.med.iacnet.com> 	<m2g20xnrvm.fsf@altair.xemacs.org> <199612270843.AAA00799@xemacs.eng.sun.com>
X-Url: http://www.miranova.com/%7Esteve/
Mail-Copies-To: never
X-Face: #!T9!#9s-3o8)*uHlX{Ug[xW7E7Wr!*L46-OxqMu\xz23v|R9q}lH?cRS{rCNe^'[`^sr5"
 f8*@r4ipO6Jl!:Ccq<xoV[Qz2u8<8-+Vwf2gzJ44lf_/y9OaQ`@#Q65{U4/TC)i2`~/M&QI$X>p:9I
 OSS'2{-)-4wBnVeg0S\O4Al@)uC[pD|+
X-Attribution: sb
From: Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com>
In-Reply-To: Martin Buchholz's message of Fri, 27 Dec 1996 00:43:40 -0800
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.100)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Date: 27 Dec 1996 21:05:04 -0800
Message-ID: <m2engbxnr3.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
Lines: 49
X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.72/XEmacs 20.0

>>>>> "Martin" == Martin Buchholz <mrb@eng.sun.com> writes:
>>>>> "Steven" == Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com> writes:

Steven> Thanks for the report.  The Makefile says the hyperbole manual is
Steven> currently broken.

Martin> I am guilty of having broken the install, by removing the hyperbole
Martin> manual in one Makefile, but not the other.

Martin> hyperbole and oobr do not TeX cleanly.  Bob, do you have
Martin> versions of these manuals that survive being run through TeX
Martin> (and makeinfo, of course)?

I'm going to go ahead and put them back in.  They TeX and makeinfo
cleanly for me[1].  It's better to find out now why things break than
to have them do so after the release.

Steven> I don't know why you get hyperbole info files in 20.0 with the same
Steven> Makefile.

Martin> We should strive to eliminate maintenance problems.  Is there any
Martin> reason not to remove one of them this way?

 [patch not cited]

None at all, so I applied that patch to beta6/beta33.

[1]
Oo-browser.texi needs this patch in order to TeX cleanly.

Index: oo-browser.texi
===================================================================
RCS file: /usr/local/xemacs/xemacs-20.0/man/oo-browser.texi,v
retrieving revision 1.1.1.1
diff -u -r1.1.1.1 oo-browser.texi
--- oo-browser.texi	1996/12/18 22:43:46	1.1.1.1
+++ oo-browser.texi	1996/12/28 04:06:10
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-\input psfig
+\input psfig.sty
 \input texinfo  @c -*-texinfo-*-
 
 @c

-- 
steve@miranova.com baur
Unsolicited commercial e-mail will be billed at $250/message.
"That Bill Clinton.  He probably doesn't know how to log on to the
Internet."  -- Rush Limbaugh, noted Computer Expert

