From xemacs-m  Tue Dec 24 14:07:07 1996
Received: from atreides.mindspring.com (qmailr@atreides.mindspring.com [204.180.142.236])
          by xemacs.cs.uiuc.edu (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP
	  id OAA24714 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Tue, 24 Dec 1996 14:07:06 -0600 (CST)
Received: (qmail 27589 invoked by uid 52477); 24 Dec 1996 20:07:15 -0000
Sender: sj@atreides.mindspring.com
To: XEmacs beta <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>
Subject: Re: Planned interface tweaks for beta6/beta33
References: <m2loaoilwv.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 1.1.1.2)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: Sudish Joseph <sudish@mindspring.com>
Date: 24 Dec 1996 15:07:15 -0500
In-Reply-To: Steven L Baur's message of 23 Dec 1996 20:52:32 -0800
Message-ID: <yvian2v3n1u4.fsf@atreides.mindspring.com>
Lines: 14
X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.76/XEmacs 20.0

In article <m2loaoilwv.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>,
Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com> writes:
> output window.  I've made this change to with-displaying-help-buffer,
> lisp-complete-symbol and apropos-print, and so far I like it.  It
> definitely makes the display look neater.

How about with-output-to-temp-buffer?  This was the one that annoyed
me, coz it's a macro and I couldn't defadvice it like w-d-h-buffer.
Another problem with with-output-to-temp-buffer is that it gets
special treatment from the byte-compiler.  Or, I think it does, I
don't understand the bytecomp...but a grep in lisp/bytecomp is quite
interesting. 

-Sudish

