From xemacs-m  Thu Apr  3 09:39:01 1997
Received: from crystal.WonderWorks.COM (crystal.WonderWorks.com [192.203.206.1])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA22088
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Thu, 3 Apr 1997 09:38:59 -0600 (CST)
Received: by crystal.WonderWorks.COM 
	id QQcjrq04704; Thu, 3 Apr 1997 10:38:58 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 1997 10:38:58 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <QQcjrq04704.199704031538@crystal.WonderWorks.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Kyle Jones <kyle_jones@wonderworks.com>
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org (XEmacs Beta List)
Subject: Re: 19.15 future 
In-Reply-To: <199704031344.IAA17669@spacely.icd.teradyne.com>
References: <9704031106.AA18333@ndsoft.com>
	<199704031344.IAA17669@spacely.icd.teradyne.com>
X-Mailer: VM 6.23 under 19.15 XEmacs Lucid
X-Face: /cA45WHG7jWq>(O3&Z57Y<"WsX5ddc,4c#w0F*zrV#=M
        0@~@,s;b,aMtR5Sqs"+nU.z^CSFQ9t`z2>W,S,]:[+2^
        Nbf6v4g>!&,7R4Ot4Wg{&tm=WX7P["9%a)_da48-^tGy
        ,qz]Z,Zz\{E.,]'EO+F)@$KtF&V

Vinnie Shelton writes:
 > Amir,
 >     The patch page can be found at:
 > 
 > http://www.xemacs.org/xemacs-19.15-patches/patch-page.html
 > 
 > There is currently a link to it from the NEWS page; soon I will put a link
 > to it from the XEmacs home page.  There are instructions for applying each
 > of the patches on the page.  Currently, all I'm doing is copying the
 > patches directly from email, but I'm planning to change that and include a 
 > little boilerplate at the start of each patch which will detail exactly 
 > what steps must be taken to take advantage of the patch.  I will be adding
 > more patches in the next few days.
 > 
 > Steve will have to make pronouncements as to whether or not there will be 
 > patch releases.  The patch page is (currently) for source changes only.

Since there are many of us and few of Steve, someone could take
up the mantle of keeping a source tree with all the blessed 19.15
patches applied and push out a tarball every couple of weeks.
The people using binary distributions lose, but such is life.

This doesn't sound difficult and would be appreciated, I think.

