From xemacs-m  Wed Apr  2 13:13:03 1997
Received: from mailhost.lanl.gov (mailhost.lanl.gov [128.165.3.12])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA19812
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Wed, 2 Apr 1997 13:13:02 -0600 (CST)
Received: from branagh.ta52.lanl.gov (branagh.ta52.lanl.gov [128.165.144.9]) by mailhost.lanl.gov (8.8.5/8.8.3) with SMTP id MAA04256 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Wed, 2 Apr 1997 12:13:04 -0700 (MST)
Received: by branagh.ta52.lanl.gov (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id MAA00558; Wed, 2 Apr 1997 12:08:02 -0700
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 1997 12:08:02 -0700
Message-Id: <199704021908.MAA00558@branagh.ta52.lanl.gov>
From: "John A. Turner" <turner@lanl.gov>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: mail mode nit
In-Reply-To: <199704021829.KAA18549@newman>
References: <E0wCVFF-0000sf-00@neal.ctd.comsat.com>
	<199704021829.KAA18549@newman>
X-Mailer: VM 6.22 under 19.15 XEmacs Lucid

William M. Perry writes:
 > Neal Becker writes:
 > >Wouldn't it be nice if TAB moved to the next field in mail mode?  Sort 
 > >of like traversing entries in a window system.
 > 
 >   you would of course have to deal with every time the user hit tab, seeing
 > if they were above or below mail-header-separator.  Other than that, I'd
 > say go for it.

I like the idea, too, but what about people who do 
(setq mail-header-separator "")?

-- 
John Turner
http://www.lanl.gov/home/turner

