From xemacs-m  Thu Mar 27 08:22:43 1997
Received: from wfdutilgw.ml.com (wfdutilf01.ml.com [206.3.74.31])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id IAA16627
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Thu, 27 Mar 1997 08:22:42 -0600 (CST)
Received: from ml1.ml.com ([199.201.57.130])
	by wfdutilgw.ml.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/MLgw-3.03) with ESMTP id JAA13927;
	Thu, 27 Mar 1997 09:20:20 -0500 (EST)
Received: from swaps-post.swaps.ml.com (swaps-post.swaps.ml.com [199.201.39.40])
	by ml1.ml.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/MLml4-2.07) with ESMTP id JAA14473;
	Thu, 27 Mar 1997 09:25:10 -0500 (EST)
Received: from swapsdvlp02.ny-swaps-develop.ml.com (swapsdvlp02.ny-swaps-develop.ml.com [146.125.10.79]) by swaps-post.swaps.ml.com (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id JAA22901; Thu, 27 Mar 1997 09:22:06 -0500 (EST)
Received: (powers@localhost) by swapsdvlp02.ny-swaps-develop.ml.com (8.6.9/8.6.9) id JAA01764; Thu, 27 Mar 1997 09:22:05 -0500
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 1997 09:22:05 -0500
Message-Id: <199703271422.JAA01764@swapsdvlp02.ny-swaps-develop.ml.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Brent B. Powers" <powers@ml.com>
To: Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com>
Cc: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: 20.1-b9 build problem under SunOS 4.1.4 and Solaris
In-Reply-To: <m2bu855z0d.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
References: <199703261835.NAA00684@swapsdvlp02.ny-swaps-develop.ml.com>
	<m2bu855z0d.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
X-Mailer: VM 6.22 under 20.0 XEmacs Lucid

Steven L Baur writes:
 > From: Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com>
 > To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
 > Subject: Re: 20.1-b9 build problem under SunOS 4.1.4 and Solaris
 > Date: 27 Mar 1997 03:56:50 -0800
 > 
 > Brent B Powers writes:
 > 
 > > Configuring and building xemacs-20.1-b9 under either SunOS 4.1.4 or
 > > Solaris 2.5, I'm getting a list of unknown symbols at temacs link
 > > time. I believe that all of the symbols are inline, and vice-versa.
 > 
 > > Same configure and make (well, slightly different prefix) work under
 > > both OS's for xemacs-20.0.  Should I try manually defining
 > > DONT_EXTERN_INLINE_FUNCTIONS ??
 > 
 > Yup.  What version of GCC are you using?
 > 
 > An obscene hack involving inline functions and (obsolete) GCC was
 > removed in this beta.  This is probably what is biting you.

(swapsdvlp02)/home/powers/Mail[1]%gcc -v
Reading specs from /apps/local/sun4/lib/gcc-lib/sparc-sun-sunos4.1.4/2.7.2/specs
gcc version 2.7.2


I didn't think that that was obsolete...

