From xemacs-m  Wed Mar 26 12:04:40 1997
Received: from burdell.cc.gatech.edu (root@burdell.cc.gatech.edu [130.207.3.207])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA02874
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Wed, 26 Mar 1997 12:04:40 -0600 (CST)
Received: from gvu1.cc.gatech.edu (kooper@gvu1.cc.gatech.edu [130.207.119.241]) by burdell.cc.gatech.edu (8.8.4/8.6.9) with ESMTP id NAA17400; Wed, 26 Mar 1997 13:04:40 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from kooper@localhost) by gvu1.cc.gatech.edu (8.8.4/8.6.9) id NAA09205; Wed, 26 Mar 1997 13:04:38 -0500 (EST)
From: kooper@cc.gatech.edu (Rob Kooper)
Message-Id: <199703261804.NAA09205@gvu1.cc.gatech.edu>
Subject: Re: Binary distributions (was Re: 19.15b104 ok on Linux & AIX)
To: Andrew.Cosgriff@cc.monash.edu.au (Andrew J Cosgriff)
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 1997 13:04:38 -0500 (EST)
Cc: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
In-Reply-To: <ruiwwqvgww3.fsf_-_@goaway.cc.monash.edu.au> from "Andrew J Cosgriff" at Mar 26, 97 02:22:36 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

> sb> I've gotten volunteers for Solaris 2.5, Intel Linux, all DEC (next
> sb> month), BSDI 2.0, 2.1 and AIX 3.2.5.
> 
> I can do an IRIX 5.3 build if need be (hopefully the Indy i've got in
> mind won't be 6.2'ified just yet, like its sibling was a few days
> ago), although my knowledge of IRIX and SGI in general is lacking
> compared to Linux/Digital Unix/Ultrix/Solaris, all of which seem to be
> covered already.
> 
> Similarly, I could do IRIX 6.2 (if a 5.3 build isn't compatbile enough
> for 6.2 as well).  But in both cases, i'd be more than happy to defer
> to someone who's more at home in SGI-land than myself.

I might be able to do IRIX, currently I'm at the conference so I haven't
really tried to build them yet. I probably give it a shot over the weekend
if you want me to.

Rob
-- 
Rob Kooper
kooper@cc.gatech.edu
http://www.gvu.gatech.edu/~rob.kooper/

