From xemacs-m  Tue Mar 25 21:23:40 1997
Received: from ALPHA9.CC.MONASH.EDU.AU (alpha9.cc.monash.edu.au [130.194.1.9])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA22498
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Tue, 25 Mar 1997 21:23:14 -0600 (CST)
Received: from goaway.cc.monash.edu.au ("port 3151"@goaway.cc.monash.edu.au)
 by vaxh.cc.monash.edu.au (PMDF V5.1-7 #16291)
 with ESMTP id <01IGYMEDQPVG8Y9EBY@vaxh.cc.monash.edu.au> for
 xemacs-beta@xemacs.org; Wed, 26 Mar 1997 14:22:38 +1100
Received: (ajc@localhost) by goaway.cc.monash.edu.au (8.8.4/8.6.4)
 id OAA22046; Wed, 26 Mar 1997 14:22:37 +1100 (EST)
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 1997 14:22:36 +1100
From: Andrew J Cosgriff <Andrew.Cosgriff@cc.monash.edu.au>
Subject: Binary distributions (was Re: 19.15b104 ok on Linux & AIX)
In-reply-to: Steven L Baur's message of 25 Mar 1997 19:07:32 -0800
Sender: Andrew.Cosgriff@cc.monash.edu.au
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Message-id: <ruiwwqvgww3.fsf_-_@goaway.cc.monash.edu.au>
MIME-version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106)
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.37/XEmacs 19.15(beta104)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-Attribution: ajc
X-URI: <URL:http://www-personal.monash.edu.au/~ajc>
X-PGP-Key-ID: C7BD53F5
X-Face: 
 PBPJ+.AE`FBN4$}H<dIo+^`A-G%mJTXXP$^4bBox##5=oF{G\[:0|sNlr%~H1,>rwwEh<qq.dHRpu8ftJ\'14l]<x(nRD>J)x?-5$MQ%Z)svNR@Q\WG6[GDr,}a@8ULwGWBsk,Pqxm!Z<lnD(Skwwe$j+<0g6N6z}>-
X-Tom-Swifty: "All the cherry trees are dead," Tom said fruitlessly.
Lines: 28
References: <199703242355.PAA13811@newman> <m2ohc7mjuz.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>

"sb" == Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com> writes:

wp> for all the platforms I have (Linux, IRIX 6.x, HP/UX 9.x, AIX,
wp> Solaris/Sparc, Solaris/x86, BSDI 2.1, BSDI 3.0, SCO OpenServer,
wp> SCO UnixWare, FreeBSD, and SunOS).

sb> Thanks William, from the deafening silence in response to the call
sb> for kit builders, I'll probably need you to build many of those.
sb> Perhaps binary kits are something we should not do in the future.

sb> I've gotten volunteers for Solaris 2.5, Intel Linux, all DEC (next
sb> month), BSDI 2.0, 2.1 and AIX 3.2.5.

I can do an IRIX 5.3 build if need be (hopefully the Indy i've got in
mind won't be 6.2'ified just yet, like its sibling was a few days
ago), although my knowledge of IRIX and SGI in general is lacking
compared to Linux/Digital Unix/Ultrix/Solaris, all of which seem to be
covered already.

Similarly, I could do IRIX 6.2 (if a 5.3 build isn't compatbile enough
for 6.2 as well).  But in both cases, i'd be more than happy to defer
to someone who's more at home in SGI-land than myself.

Andrew.
-- 
 - Andrew J. Cosgriff -                  ajc@bing.wattle.id.au    (PGP/MIME ok)
 +61 3 9905 1165 (bh) 9905 4746 (fax)    http://www-personal.monash.edu.au/~ajc
                 "It's been lovely, but I have to scream now."

