From xemacs-m  Tue Mar 25 20:53:03 1997
Received: from mailhost.lanl.gov (mailhost.lanl.gov [128.165.3.12])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA21068
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Tue, 25 Mar 1997 20:53:02 -0600 (CST)
Received: from branagh.ta52.lanl.gov (branagh.ta52.lanl.gov [128.165.144.9]) by mailhost.lanl.gov (8.8.5/8.8.3) with SMTP id TAA25075 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Tue, 25 Mar 1997 19:53:02 -0700 (MST)
Received: by branagh.ta52.lanl.gov (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id TAA15068; Tue, 25 Mar 1997 19:48:13 -0700
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 1997 19:48:13 -0700
Message-Id: <199703260248.TAA15068@branagh.ta52.lanl.gov>
From: "John A. Turner" <turner@branagh.ta52.lanl.gov>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: NEWS submission
In-Reply-To: <199703252230.RAA19898@blight.IntraNet.com>
References: <199703252230.RAA19898@blight.IntraNet.com>
X-Mailer: VM 6.22 under 19.15 XEmacs Lucid (beta104)
Reply-To: turner@lanl.gov

Jonathan Edwards writes:

 > is lazy-lock working again? I gave up and switched to fast-lock.

Has been working fine for me since the infamous sit-for bug was
fixed...

(except for the "nothing highlighted until some action in the buffer
if loaded by button-2 in dired" problem, but that's not a big deal)

-John

