From xemacs-m  Sun Mar 23 17:30:02 1997
Received: from jagor.srce.hr (hniksic@jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA09354
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Sun, 23 Mar 1997 17:30:01 -0600 (CST)
Received: (from hniksic@localhost)
          by jagor.srce.hr (8.8.5/8.8.4)
	  id AAA12774; Mon, 24 Mar 1997 00:29:59 +0100 (MET)
Sender: hniksic@public.srce.hr
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: Buffer-specific display-tables
References: <199703232320.RAA09285@xemacs.org>
X-URL: ftp://gnjilux.cc.fer.hr/pub/unix/util/wget/
X-Attribution: Hrv
X-Face: &}4JQk=L;e.~x+|eo]#DGk@x3~ed!.~lZ}YQcYb7f[WL9L'Z*+OyA\nA
        EL1M(".[qvI#a2E6WYI5>>e7'@_)3Ol9p|Nn2wNa/;~06jL*B%tTcn/X
        vhAu7qeES0\|MF%$;sI#yn1+y"
From: Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr>
Date: 24 Mar 1997 00:29:58 +0100
In-Reply-To: Chuck Thompson's message of Sun, 23 Mar 1997 17:20:10 -0600
Message-ID: <kig2096dw5l.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
Lines: 29
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.33/XEmacs 19.14

Chuck Thompson <cthomp@xemacs.org> writes:

>     Hrv> Does it mean the display table problem is fixable?
> Yes, it should be.

Great.  There's a reason I actually need it, other than academic
discussion.  The display tables are used by Gnus to make sure that
the Summary remains nicely formatted, even when containing control
characters.  It's kinda annoying to have that functionality ifdef-ed
to work in GNU Emacs only.

So, if Kyle doesn't fix it, I'll give it a try.

Off-this-topic:

Traditional Emacs code often looks like this:

(let ((i 0))
  (while (< i 32)
    ... do something with i...
    (setq i (1+ i))))

What does the MULE-correct equivalent code look like?

-- 
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
"Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct,
not tried it."                                    -- Donald Knuth

