From xemacs-m  Tue Mar 18 13:13:26 1997
Received: from altair.xemacs.org (steve@xemacs.miranova.com [206.190.83.19])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA13357
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Tue, 18 Mar 1997 13:13:25 -0600 (CST)
Received: (from steve@localhost)
	by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA26162;
	Tue, 18 Mar 1997 11:25:12 -0800
Mail-Copies-To: never
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: Subwindows
References: <5042.858710699@kocrsw12>
X-Url: http://www.miranova.com/%7Esteve/
X-Face: #!T9!#9s-3o8)*uHlX{Ug[xW7E7Wr!*L46-OxqMu\xz23v|R9q}lH?cRS{rCNe^'[`^sr5"
 f8*@r4ipO6Jl!:Ccq<xoV[Qz2u8<8-+Vwf2gzJ44lf_/y9OaQ`@#Q65{U4/TC)i2`~/M&QI$X>p:9I
 OSS'2{-)-4wBnVeg0S\O4Al@)uC[pD|+
X-Attribution: sb
From: Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com>
In-Reply-To: Mike Scheidler's message of Tue, 18 Mar 1997 13:44:59 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.105)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Date: 18 Mar 1997 11:25:11 -0800
Message-ID: <m24te9atpk.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
Lines: 23
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.28/XEmacs 20.1(beta9)

Mike Scheidler writes:

> I was nosing around in the lispref and saw mention of subwindows.
> Interesting. Did a 'M-x apropos subwindow' and came up with several
> hits.  Great.

> Tried to eval '(make-subwindow)' and got this error:

>         subwindows are not functional in 19.14; they will be in 19.15

> Rats.

> Maybe an updated message is in order?

Yup.  Or better still why not strip the code altogether until someone
fixes it?

> What is the intent of subwindows, and what is their status?

Maintainerless & broken.
-- 
steve@miranova.com baur
Unsolicited commercial e-mail will be billed at $250/message.

