From xemacs-m  Mon Mar 17 14:44:14 1997
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US (CNRI.Reston.VA.US [132.151.1.1])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id OAA14752
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Mon, 17 Mar 1997 14:44:12 -0600 (CST)
Received: from newcnri.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa20529;
          17 Mar 97 15:45 EST
Received: from anthem.CNRI.Reston.Va.US by newcnri.CNRI.Reston.Va.US (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id PAA06436; Mon, 17 Mar 1997 15:45:14 -0500
Received: by anthem.CNRI.Reston.Va.US (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id PAA06279; Mon, 17 Mar 1997 15:45:13 -0500
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 1997 15:45:13 -0500
Message-Id: <199703172045.PAA06279@anthem.CNRI.Reston.Va.US>
From: "Barry A. Warsaw" <bwarsaw@CNRI.Reston.VA.US>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Bob Weiner <weiner@infodock.com>
Cc: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: XEmacs needs a GUI toolkit interface.
References: <199703171533.HAA00276@newman>
	<199703172033.MAA11925@infodock.com>
Reply-To: bwarsaw@python.org
X-Attribution: BAW
X-Oblique-Strategy: Destroy the most important thing
X-Url: http://www.python.org/~bwarsaw


>>>>> "BW" == Bob Weiner <weiner@infodock.com> writes:

    BW> Right now, I think TK is probably a good way to go because it
    BW> is portable and has a fairly rich set of widgets and multiple
    BW> language bindings.

I completely agree.  Somewhere in the dim recesses of my memory, I
seem to recall that someone did an Elisp binding to Tk.  Dejanews only
seems to give me back hits on Guile and Scheme bindings to Tk, so
maybe that's what I was thinking about.

-Barry

