From xemacs-m  Mon Mar 17 12:05:51 1997
Received: from altair.xemacs.org (steve@xemacs.miranova.com [206.190.83.19])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA06157
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Mon, 17 Mar 1997 12:05:49 -0600 (CST)
Received: (from steve@localhost)
	by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA19486;
	Mon, 17 Mar 1997 10:17:40 -0800
Mail-Copies-To: never
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: 'gmake beta' sucks eggs
References: <9703171339.AA28121@ndsoft.com>
X-Url: http://www.miranova.com/%7Esteve/
X-Face: #!T9!#9s-3o8)*uHlX{Ug[xW7E7Wr!*L46-OxqMu\xz23v|R9q}lH?cRS{rCNe^'[`^sr5"
 f8*@r4ipO6Jl!:Ccq<xoV[Qz2u8<8-+Vwf2gzJ44lf_/y9OaQ`@#Q65{U4/TC)i2`~/M&QI$X>p:9I
 OSS'2{-)-4wBnVeg0S\O4Al@)uC[pD|+
X-Attribution: sb
From: Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com>
In-Reply-To: "Amir J. Katz"'s message of Mon, 17 Mar 97 16:39:31 IDT
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.105)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Date: 17 Mar 1997 10:17:36 -0800
Message-ID: <m2lo7mtmbj.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
Lines: 23
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.27/XEmacs 20.1(beta8)

Does this make a difference?  I'm not sure why you'd lose on this and
not on bytecompiling the bytecompiler.

Index: lib-src/update-elc.sh
===================================================================
RCS file: /usr/local/xemacs/xemacs-19.15/lib-src/update-elc.sh,v
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -u -r1.10 update-elc.sh
--- update-elc.sh	1997/03/16 05:54:51	1.10
+++ update-elc.sh	1997/03/17 18:03:08
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@
 echo "Recompiling in `pwd|sed 's|^/tmp_mnt||'`"
 echo "          with $REAL..."
 
-$EMACS -batch -q -no-site-file -l cleantree -f batch-remove-old-elc lisp
+$EMACS -batch -q -l `pwd`/lisp/prim/cleantree -f batch-remove-old-elc lisp
 
 prune_vc="( -name SCCS -o -name RCS -o -name CVS ) -prune -o"
 

-- 
steve@miranova.com baur
Unsolicited commercial e-mail will be billed at $250/message.

