From xemacs-m  Wed Dec 18 12:35:19 1996
Received: from mail.cis.ohio-state.edu (mail.cis.ohio-state.edu [164.107.8.55])
          by xemacs.cs.uiuc.edu (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP
	  id MAA03921 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Wed, 18 Dec 1996 12:35:18 -0600 (CST)
Received: from calico.cis.ohio-state.edu (calico.cis.ohio-state.edu [164.107.142.11]) by mail.cis.ohio-state.edu (8.6.7/8.6.4) with ESMTP id OAA00944; Tue, 17 Dec 1996 14:10:52 -0500
Received: (ware@localhost) by calico.cis.ohio-state.edu (8.8.0/8.6.4) id OAA12334; Tue, 17 Dec 1996 14:10:51 -0500 (EST)
To: turner@lanl.gov
Cc: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: The grass really was greener in 19.13
References: <m2engp4sai.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
	<vwm916x6qn7.fsf@calico.cis.ohio-state.edu>
	<199612171758.KAA10590@branagh.lanl.gov>
From: Pete Ware <ware@cis.ohio-state.edu>
Date: 17 Dec 1996 14:10:50 -0500
In-Reply-To: John Turner's message of Tue, 17 Dec 1996 10:58:08 -0700
Message-ID: <vwmafrdvvet.fsf@calico.cis.ohio-state.edu>
Lines: 13
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.2.40/XEmacs 19.15

John Turner <turner@xdiv.lanl.gov> writes:

> Just had to say that this message really pointed out the disadvantage
> in having smiley turned on, didn't it?  :)  I should look and see if
> there's an unsmilify command...

Yeah, I used to have that problem to, until I switched to:

	(setq smiley-regexp-alist smiley-nosey-regexp-alist)

which is more selective about what defines a smiley.

--pete

