From xemacs-m  Thu Mar  6 12:23:52 1997
Received: from macon.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (macon2.Informatik.Uni-Tuebingen.De [134.2.13.2])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA22072
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Thu, 6 Mar 1997 12:23:51 -0600 (CST)
Received: from modas.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (modas.Informatik.Uni-Tuebingen.De [134.2.12.3]) by macon.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (8.8.4/8.8.3/AIX-4.1/WSI-1.0) with SMTP id TAA14770 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Thu, 6 Mar 1997 19:23:52 +0100
Received: by modas.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (AIX 4.1/UCB 5.64/4.03)
          id AA24118; Thu, 6 Mar 1997 19:23:49 +0100
Sender: sperber@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: dired info files missing
References: <199703061703.JAA28960@palrel1.hp.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.105)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: sperber@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor])
Date: 06 Mar 1997 19:23:48 +0100
In-Reply-To: Shane Holder's message of Thu, 6 Mar 1997 11:05:10 -0600
Message-Id: <y9lybc0q3pn.fsf@modas.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>
Lines: 25
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.15/XEmacs 20.1

>>>>> "Shane" == Shane Holder <holder@rsn.hp.com> writes:

Shane> In XEmacs 20.1 [Lucid] (hppa1.1-hp-hpux10.01) of Wed Mar  5 1997 on rlab24

Shane> Please describe exactly what actions triggered the bug
Shane> and the precise symptoms of the bug:

Shane> The info files for dired seem to be missing.	If you do a C-u h in
Shane> the dired buffer you get the dired message below.  I searched the b4
Shane> tree with the b5 patches installed, and couldn't find the dired info
Shane> files.

Presently there aren't any.  (I.e. none describing the new dired.)
There are menus instead :-} :-} :-}

Seriously, I definitely won't have time to upgrade/extend the
documentation.  The code hackery (and I'm not even a maintainer) has
already taken up more than I ever expected.  I'm not sure how far Ange
and Sandy are on this.  Volunteers are welcome.  However, I've never
ever felt the urge to look at the dired documentation, so I don't
think it's much of a loss.  The lack of EFS (the non-dired part)
documentation is more serious, IMHO.

Cheers =8-} Mike

