From xemacs-m  Thu Dec  5 15:34:43 1996
Received: from venus.Sun.COM (venus.Sun.COM [192.9.25.5]) by xemacs.cs.uiuc.edu (8.8.3/8.8.3) with SMTP id PAA06565 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Thu, 5 Dec 1996 15:34:42 -0600 (CST)
Received: from Eng.Sun.COM ([129.146.1.25]) by venus.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6/mail.byaddr) with SMTP id NAA21359; Thu, 5 Dec 1996 13:33:56 -0800
Received: from kindra.eng.sun.com by Eng.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6/SMI-5.3)
	id NAA10605; Thu, 5 Dec 1996 13:33:54 -0800
Received: from xemacs.eng.sun.com by kindra.eng.sun.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id NAA06063; Thu, 5 Dec 1996 13:33:52 -0800
Received: by xemacs.eng.sun.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id NAA01918; Thu, 5 Dec 1996 13:33:52 -0800
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 1996 13:33:52 -0800
Message-Id: <199612052133.NAA01918@xemacs.eng.sun.com>
From: Martin Buchholz <mrb@Eng.Sun.COM>
To: =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCPGkyLBsoQiAbJEJDTkknGyhC?= / MORIOKA Tomohiko
 <morioka@jaist.ac.jp>
Cc: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: src/s/*shr.h
In-Reply-To: <199612051703.CAA25450@mikan.jaist.ac.jp>
References: <199612051703.CAA25450@mikan.jaist.ac.jp>
Reply-To: Martin Buchholz <mrb@Eng.Sun.COM>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.94)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

>>>>> "MT" == MORIOKA Tomohiko writes:

MT>   I think src/s/*shr.h should rename to src/s/*-shr.h.  Otherwise,
MT> `--dynamic=yes' does not work.

There does seem to be a mismatch.  XEmacs today is inconsistent,
sometimes using "-", sometimes not:

(mrb@xemacs) ~/e/w/editor/src/s $ l *shr*
hpux10shr.h       hpux9shr.h        sunos4-0shr.h     sunos4-1-3shr.h
hpux8shr.h        sco5-shr.h        sunos4-1-2shr.h   sunos4-1shr.h
(mrb@xemacs) ~/e/w/editor/src/s $ l *stat*
decosf1-3-static.h   linux-static.h       sol2-static.h
decosf3-1-static.h   sol2-3-static.h
decosf3-2-static.h   sol2-4-static.h

We need to decide on one or the other.

The advantage of dropping the "-" is for (slight) consistency with
Emacs 19.34:

(mrb@xemacs) ~/e/34/src/s $ echo *shr*
hpux9shr.h sunos4shr.h

The advantage of keeping the "-" is general esthetics.  I vote for
this choice.  It would be nice if someone who uses sunos4*shr would test
building with the *shr files renamed (Tomohiko ?).

-- 
Martin Buchholz <mrb@eng.sun.com>
XEmacs Developer, Sun Microsystems Inc.

