From xemacs-m  Tue Mar  4 09:50:04 1997
Received: from mercury.Sun.COM (mercury.Sun.COM [192.9.25.1])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id JAA18391
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Tue, 4 Mar 1997 09:50:01 -0600 (CST)
Received: from Canada.Sun.COM ([129.155.5.101]) by mercury.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6/mail.byaddr) with SMTP id HAA11586; Tue, 4 Mar 1997 07:48:00 -0800
Received: from scooter.canada.sun.com by Canada.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6/SMI-5.3)
	id KAA24879; Tue, 4 Mar 1997 10:49:27 -0500
Received: from verve.canada.sun.com by scooter.canada.sun.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id KAA25718; Tue, 4 Mar 1997 10:49:25 -0500
Received: by verve.canada.sun.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id KAA04220; Tue, 4 Mar 1997 10:49:27 -0500
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 1997 10:49:27 -0500
Message-Id: <199703041549.KAA04220@verve.canada.sun.com>
From: Georg Nikodym <georgn@Canada.Sun.COM>
To: bwarsaw@python.org
Cc: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: b96 failure
In-Reply-To: <199703040042.TAA16084@anthem.CNRI.Reston.Va.US>
References: <199703032025.PAA04168@verve.canada.sun.com>
	<m2wwroekfm.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
	<199703032211.RAA12116@anthem.CNRI.Reston.Va.US>
	<m2n2skehmy.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
	<199703032237.RAA08125@verve.canada.sun.com>
	<199703040042.TAA16084@anthem.CNRI.Reston.Va.US>
Reply-To: georgn@Canada.Sun.COM
X-Face:  ,~EI@l7'&P{\d++e`EMjNTNpzsxJPg(H]?Sd_T3xIlq[(PT[.D;A_/k)qfeC@m\/1]A{vZD
 r4&Lme-/M]c'Q>>:VM|L^<ED=j@dG!ld,bQ:IhT53q'x>6wZKH3iCT6Ff1-`*z{vCiT}+%(irA6TOn
 S~pFtml1bL\=kp%0PsLcF3+Q/e${o|S/<NUFDrU@;^o(D+av1g>Ce=ztlPGb$?up%c-*l'wmjw\sw;
 D__0Z;+93I+Kx6Mxdc]+|2V03aE@D8-fMT_v[~~FC9I\*|72QVW,aQ!`hHp_.gE.W&kxla2#)\Cmo
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.105)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

>>>>> "BAW" == Barry A Warsaw <bwarsaw@anthem.cnri.reston.va.us> writes:

>>>>> "GN" == Georg Nikodym <georgn@Canada.Sun.COM> writes:

 GN> My comment on the args to open(2) stand, though.

 GN> The good news is that I now have an XEmacs binary...

 BAW> Not me.  Sigh, I'm still getting the infinite rebuilds.  Guess
 BAW> I'll just wait until b97.  I seem to have much more luck with
 BAW> the odd number betas anyway.  :-)

Did you wait long enough?  It still does (count 'em!) THREE!

