From xemacs-m  Tue Mar  4 03:20:19 1997
Received: from dres.elam.org (dres@cola44.scsn.net [206.25.247.44])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id DAA16092
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Tue, 4 Mar 1997 03:20:15 -0600 (CST)
Received: (from dres@localhost)
	by dres.elam.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id EAA01537;
	Tue, 4 Mar 1997 04:18:14 -0500
To: XEmacs Beta List <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>
Subject: memory usage info
X-Url: http://www.cs.sc.edu/~moss
X-Organization: Dres Computer Services
X-No-Archive: true
X-Face:  "R3Ms&!j++.]J8DwisON-l7#S<Jw[MsP|I<K?28b~f-<w^vjeAQ-k@$-Az>OloY'V?!^-!2
 9G+7Z7OzClzr2{3e<RFn%f*t%B<*|sT->ni9BN\pzkTp<dg6+lOtI-rg*]Fjgr0n.=ChFX:_+T7fKT
 *Z[}xvSK"jV~QH7*v}xZ,1rlb+Ro`,)#2Econ*g^>}ehc,\AhKBZ\Sf/HVG+p\*?'(&ct2w6Fr:w9m
 o|9R&.D-)1]:&sN-6o'\`7W${f1$2BCy6qSl&._{ILYCZ?X-[?M!](N
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.105)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: James LewisMoss <dres@scsn.net>
Date: 04 Mar 1997 04:18:13 -0500
Message-ID: <hh3eucdnh2.fsf@dres.elam.org>
Lines: 20
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.15/XEmacs 20.1

does anything here look unusual?  (and on another note is there an
easier way to put the output of a command into a buffer?)

(insert-string (prin1-to-string (window-memory-usage (car (window-list)))))


((face-cache . 221864) (glyph-cache . 160) (scrollbar-instances . 192) (line-start-cache . 8248) (other-redisplay . 482484) (other . 576) nil (actually-requested . 471860) (malloc-overhead . 175120) (dynarr-overhead . 66544))

This is with two frames (err windows maybe I get confused) open.  One
minibuffer frame and one normal frame.  Current memory usage according
to top is 28308.

Checking individual buffers doesn't seem to find anything wrong.

Jim

-- 
@James LewisMoss                 | moss@cs.sc.edu | Blessed Be!
@    http://www.cs.sc.edu/~moss  | dres@scsn.net  | Linux is cool!
@"Argue for your limitations and sure enough, they're yours." Bach

