From xemacs-m  Mon Mar  3 06:50:57 1997
Received: from frege.math.ethz.ch (root@frege-d-math-north-g-west.math.ethz.ch [129.132.145.3])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id GAA18170
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Mon, 3 Mar 1997 06:50:53 -0600 (CST)
Received: from fresnel.math.ethz.ch (vroonhof@fresnel [129.132.145.6]) by frege.math.ethz.ch (8.6.12/Main-STAT-mailer) with ESMTP id NAA01310; Mon, 3 Mar 1997 13:50:36 +0100
Received: (vroonhof@localhost) by fresnel.math.ethz.ch (8.6.9/D-MATH-client) id NAA23963; Mon, 3 Mar 1997 13:49:03 +0100
Sender: vroonhof@math.ethz.ch
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org, Kyle Jones <kyle_jones@wonderworks.com>
Subject: Re: vm-scroll-forward doesn't [VM 6.16 as in XEmacs 19.15 b96]
References: <199703030817.JAA05280@rubens.esat.kuleuven.ac.be> <QQcfgf24059.199703030920@crystal.WonderWorks.COM>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.94)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: Jan Vroonhof <vroonhof@math.ethz.ch>
Date: 03 Mar 1997 13:49:02 +0100
In-Reply-To: Kyle Jones's message of Mon, 3 Mar 1997 04:20:15 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <byg1yd5ef5.fsf@math.ethz.ch>
Lines: 18
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.16/XEmacs 19.15



Kyle, since VM since to be the only non prim code  using the visible-p
stuff and I plan on working on it  somewhere this week (along the
lines of what I posted recently here) I am asking you wether you have
some preferences?

Kyle Jones <kyle_jones@wonderworks.com> writes:

> frame-totally-visible-p is broken again.  It works sometimes, but
> sometimes returns nil when there's nothing overlapping the frame.
> 
> Can we just agree that virtual desktops are an abomination before
> the Lord and go back to the old frame visibility model?

Why does VM use frame-totally-visible-p anyway?

Jan

