From xemacs-m  Mon Mar  3 01:13:42 1997
Received: from altair.xemacs.org (steve@xemacs.miranova.com [206.190.83.19])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id BAA17126
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Mon, 3 Mar 1997 01:13:39 -0600 (CST)
Received: (from steve@localhost)
	by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id XAA11862;
	Sun, 2 Mar 1997 23:25:05 -0800
Mail-Copies-To: never
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: Any reason to keep lisp/{energize,epoch} in distribution?
References: <199703030700.XAA03033@infodock.com>
X-Url: http://www.miranova.com/%7Esteve/
X-Face: #!T9!#9s-3o8)*uHlX{Ug[xW7E7Wr!*L46-OxqMu\xz23v|R9q}lH?cRS{rCNe^'[`^sr5"
 f8*@r4ipO6Jl!:Ccq<xoV[Qz2u8<8-+Vwf2gzJ44lf_/y9OaQ`@#Q65{U4/TC)i2`~/M&QI$X>p:9I
 OSS'2{-)-4wBnVeg0S\O4Al@)uC[pD|+
X-Attribution: sb
From: Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com>
In-Reply-To: Bob Weiner's message of Sun, 2 Mar 1997 23:00:28 -0800
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.105)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Date: 02 Mar 1997 23:25:01 -0800
Message-ID: <m2lo85tp2q.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
Lines: 14
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.17/XEmacs 20.1

Bob Weiner writes:

> Are there any users of energize left in the world?
> It looks like the epoch directory was supposed to be an epoch compatibility
> package that Chuck never had time to write.  In any case, the epoch
> dir adds no value at this point, since if it does get written, a directory
> can simply be added.

Yup, lisp/epoch can go.

I won't remove lisp/energize without an O.K. from stig.
-- 
steve@miranova.com baur
Unsolicited commercial e-mail will be billed at $250/message.

