From xemacs-m  Sat Mar  1 18:04:40 1997
Received: from crystal.WonderWorks.COM (crystal.WonderWorks.com [192.203.206.1])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA22487
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Sat, 1 Mar 1997 18:04:39 -0600 (CST)
Received: by crystal.WonderWorks.COM 
	id QQcfbc20420; Sat, 1 Mar 1997 19:04:39 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sat, 1 Mar 1997 19:04:39 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <QQcfbc20420.199703020004@crystal.WonderWorks.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Kyle Jones <kyle_jones@wonderworks.com>
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: RFC:  pre-display-buffer-function [was Re: annoying buffer switching/focus  behavior]
In-Reply-To: <kigrahz9ol0.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
References: <yvtafoo8frj.fsf@corona.pixar.com>
	<yvt91488atk.fsf@corona.pixar.com>
	<m2d8tjjknx.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
	<QQcfax19282.199703012246@crystal.WonderWorks.COM>
	<m2u3mvi3vc.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
	<kigrahz9ol0.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
X-Face: /cA45WHG7jWq>(O3&Z57Y<"WsX5ddc,4c#w0F*zrV#=M
        0@~@,s;b,aMtR5Sqs"+nU.z^CSFQ9t`z2>W,S,]:[+2^
        Nbf6v4g>!&,7R4Ot4Wg{&tm=WX7P["9%a)_da48-^tGy
        ,qz]Z,Zz\{E.,]'EO+F)@$KtF&V

Hrvoje Niksic writes:
 > Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com> writes:
 > 
 > > O.K.  Add a new variable then.
 > 
 > Why?  I don't think anyone actually likes the behaviour we now have.
 > In fact, everyone considers it broken.  GNUmacs is said not to behave
 > that way (haven't checked).

It is old behavior and it is documented and it is useful.  People
consider it broken because they use a different frame management
model.

