From xemacs-m  Sat Mar  1 12:15:52 1997
Received: from crystal.WonderWorks.COM (crystal.WonderWorks.com [192.203.206.1])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA21124
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Sat, 1 Mar 1997 12:15:51 -0600 (CST)
Received: by crystal.WonderWorks.COM 
	id QQcfaf15601; Sat, 1 Mar 1997 13:15:50 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sat, 1 Mar 1997 13:15:50 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <QQcfaf15601.199703011815@crystal.WonderWorks.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Kyle Jones <kyle_jones@wonderworks.com>
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: efs not working?
In-Reply-To: <kigbu9333j2.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
References: <kigwwrr3ec4.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
	<QQcfac15117.199703011740@crystal.WonderWorks.COM>
	<kigbu9333j2.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
X-Face: /cA45WHG7jWq>(O3&Z57Y<"WsX5ddc,4c#w0F*zrV#=M
        0@~@,s;b,aMtR5Sqs"+nU.z^CSFQ9t`z2>W,S,]:[+2^
        Nbf6v4g>!&,7R4Ot4Wg{&tm=WX7P["9%a)_da48-^tGy
        ,qz]Z,Zz\{E.,]'EO+F)@$KtF&V

Hrvoje Niksic writes:
 > [...]
 > Anyway, if this is resolved, I'd vote for dumping efs-auto.  A user can
 > always use `efs-path-format-string' to choose whether efs will
 > actually be loaded or not.

That would break code.  Do no harm.  Don't make old users of efs
gryte in frustration.

