From xemacs-m  Sat Mar  1 00:21:33 1997
Received: from venus.Sun.COM (venus.Sun.COM [192.9.25.5])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id AAA18534
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Sat, 1 Mar 1997 00:21:32 -0600 (CST)
Received: from infodock.com (wave.infodock.com [206.13.40.192]) by venus.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6/mail.byaddr) with ESMTP id WAA10742 for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 22:21:03 -0800
Received: (from weiner@localhost) by infodock.com (8.7.4/8.7.3) id WAA04094; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 22:20:50 -0800
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 22:20:50 -0800
From: Bob Weiner <weiner@infodock.com>
Message-Id: <199703010620.WAA04094@infodock.com>
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
In-reply-to: <m23euj1k6p.fsf@altair.xemacs.org> (message from Steven L Baur on 26 Feb 1997 10:44:30 -0800)
Subject: Re: 20.1-b2 with dynamic PURESIZE success, mostly

>>>>> "SLB" == Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com> writes:

   SLB> Weird stuff seems to happen with too small PURESIZEs.  The only time I
   SLB> got an actual coredump in testing was when I had it set to 30k.

I agree.  In the distant past, I've seen highly excess garbage collection
occur for some unknown reason when not enough open PURESPACE was left.
I like it at around 93% and never have problems then.

Bob

