From xemacs-m  Thu Feb 27 12:36:33 1997
Received: from altair.xemacs.org (steve@[206.190.83.19])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA07400
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Thu, 27 Feb 1997 12:36:32 -0600 (CST)
Received: (from steve@localhost)
	by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA21085;
	Thu, 27 Feb 1997 10:47:58 -0800
Mail-Copies-To: never
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: update-elc question
References: <E0w06AM-0007J9-00@chekov.ctd.comsat.com>
X-Url: http://www.miranova.com/%7Esteve/
X-Face: #!T9!#9s-3o8)*uHlX{Ug[xW7E7Wr!*L46-OxqMu\xz23v|R9q}lH?cRS{rCNe^'[`^sr5"
 f8*@r4ipO6Jl!:Ccq<xoV[Qz2u8<8-+Vwf2gzJ44lf_/y9OaQ`@#Q65{U4/TC)i2`~/M&QI$X>p:9I
 OSS'2{-)-4wBnVeg0S\O4Al@)uC[pD|+
X-Attribution: sb
From: Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com>
In-Reply-To: Neal Becker's message of Thu, 27 Feb 1997 08:46:34 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.105)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Date: 27 Feb 1997 10:47:52 -0800
Message-ID: <m2rai2uluv.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
Lines: 17
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.15/XEmacs 20.1

Neal Becker writes:

> When patching 20.1b2 -> 20.1b3 I did make all-elc.  I noticed some
> messages like this:

> Compiling /u2/src/xemacs-20.1-b3/lisp/hm--html-menus/hm--html-mode.el...
> Loading font-lock... (file font-lock.el is newer)
> Loading hm--html... (file hm--html.el is newer)

> I suppose that this is because the build process for elc doesn't know
> about lisp file dependencies.  Is this a problem?

Potentially, if a defsubst or a defmacro is involved.  We've been
fairly lucky so far getting away with not generating depencies.
-- 
steve@miranova.com baur
Unsolicited commercial e-mail will be billed at $250/message.

