From xemacs-m  Tue Feb 25 08:34:22 1997
Received: from steadfast.teradyne.com (steadfast.teradyne.com [131.101.1.200])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id IAA04791
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Tue, 25 Feb 1997 08:34:22 -0600 (CST)
Received: from kiki.icd.teradyne.com (kiki.icd.teradyne.com [131.101.1.30]) by steadfast.teradyne.com (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id JAA19553; Tue, 25 Feb 1997 09:37:02 -0500 (EST)
Received: from spacely.icd.teradyne.com (spacely.icd.teradyne.com [131.101.10.9]) by kiki.icd.teradyne.com (8.7.1/8.7.1) with SMTP id JAA04636; Tue, 25 Feb 1997 09:30:48 -0500 (EST)
Received: from spacely by spacely.icd.teradyne.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id JAA09103; Tue, 25 Feb 1997 09:33:45 -0500
Message-Id: <199702251433.JAA09103@spacely.icd.teradyne.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0gamma 1/27/96
To: Jan Vroonhof <vroonhof@math.ethz.ch>
cc: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: [19.15-b95 / 20.1-b2] lazy-lock lossage? 
In-reply-to: vroonhof's message of 25 Feb 1997 15:17:38 +0100.
	     <bysp2lnf5p.fsf@riesz.math.ethz.ch> 
reply-to: acs@acm.org
X-Attribution: Vin
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 1997 09:33:44 -0500
From: Vinnie Shelton  <shelton@icd.teradyne.com>

If lazy-lock is not on for the buffer (ie if the buffer is too small),
the options item is not selected.  This is, IMO, a bug, because when a user 
first enables lazy-lock in say, the scratch buffer, the option item is not 
selected.  I have always found this confusing.

vin

> Simon Marshall <Simon.Marshall@esrin.esa.it> writes:
> 
> >  (add-hook 'font-lock-mode-hook 'turn-on-lazy-lock)
> > 
> 
> It was done in .Xemacs-options, but the Options menu has lazy not
> ticked?
> 
> Jan
> P
> P.S. Removing lazylock helps. The strange thing is the LaTeX output
> buffer isn't normally fontlocked and secondly it is way under
> lazy-lock-minimal size.
> 


