From xemacs-m  Tue Feb 25 01:58:55 1997
Received: from altair.xemacs.org (steve@xemacs.miranova.com [206.190.83.19])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id BAA22080
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Tue, 25 Feb 1997 01:58:54 -0600 (CST)
Received: (from steve@localhost)
	by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id AAA16318;
	Tue, 25 Feb 1997 00:10:43 -0800
Mail-Copies-To: never
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: [19.15-b95 / 20.1-b2] lazy-lock lossage?
References: <vk67zhvr5f.fsf@cdc.noaa.gov> 	<u9lo8dhora.fsf@neal.ctd.comsat.com> 	<vk3eulvpur.fsf@cdc.noaa.gov> <199702242235.PAA23295@branagh.ta52.lanl.gov> <m2d8tplq8v.fsf@altair.xemacs.org> <m3rai5fz3s.fsf@jens.metrix.de>
X-Url: http://www.miranova.com/%7Esteve/
X-Face: #!T9!#9s-3o8)*uHlX{Ug[xW7E7Wr!*L46-OxqMu\xz23v|R9q}lH?cRS{rCNe^'[`^sr5"
 f8*@r4ipO6Jl!:Ccq<xoV[Qz2u8<8-+Vwf2gzJ44lf_/y9OaQ`@#Q65{U4/TC)i2`~/M&QI$X>p:9I
 OSS'2{-)-4wBnVeg0S\O4Al@)uC[pD|+
X-Attribution: sb
From: Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com>
In-Reply-To: Jens Lautenbacher's message of 25 Feb 1997 02:33:59 +0100
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.105)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Date: 25 Feb 1997 00:10:42 -0800
Message-ID: <m2iv3h71bx.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
Lines: 12
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.15/XEmacs 20.1

Jens Lautenbacher writes:

> I glanced through the comments at the beginning of lazy lock and I'm
> just wondering if there are any plans to give it the necessary support
> in XEmacs, too.

I don't have any problems about integrating the necessary patches (if
they're doable), but given how much better fast-lock works on current
XEmacs -vs- lazy-lock I don't think it's worth it.
-- 
steve@miranova.com baur
Unsolicited commercial e-mail will be billed at $250/message.

