From xemacs-m  Mon Feb 24 19:34:20 1997
Received: from jens.metrix.de (jens@jens.metrix.de [194.123.88.124])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA20255
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Mon, 24 Feb 1997 19:34:17 -0600 (CST)
Received: (from jens@localhost) by jens.metrix.de (8.7.6/8.7.3) id CAA00578; Tue, 25 Feb 1997 02:34:02 +0100
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: [19.15-b95 / 20.1-b2] lazy-lock lossage?
References: <vk67zhvr5f.fsf@cdc.noaa.gov> 	<u9lo8dhora.fsf@neal.ctd.comsat.com> 	<vk3eulvpur.fsf@cdc.noaa.gov> <199702242235.PAA23295@branagh.ta52.lanl.gov> <m2d8tplq8v.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
X-Face: Z[@OB)("ZvE?ev~1b+b!0ZUB.$%rh.9qE>dVf>q}Q/V?%d`J3gd!LR\aAZ8<Hwi]xTA(:*c;i3,?K?+rCy*^b$)a,}E?eo},}x2]5LlJysyoUOK"o[>K)'\Ulb7y-7*.If^;rHl['oa)n_M7E6w+LDKMs"G8_`c)uOS1^}.1|8Ill]7X68X-paeUOpBhz<F`B0?~^2Et~GYfw~/0]H]nx4~C_E/_mp#^7Ixc:
Reply-To: jens@lemming0.lem.uni-karlsruhe.de
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.105)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: Jens Lautenbacher <jens@metrix.de>
Date: 25 Feb 1997 02:33:59 +0100
In-Reply-To: Steven L Baur's message of 24 Feb 1997 15:48:48 -0800
Message-ID: <m3rai5fz3s.fsf@jens.metrix.de>
Lines: 26
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.15/XEmacs 19.15

Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com> writes:

> John A Turner writes:
> 
> > I'll try dropping in lazy-lock 1.15 just to check, though...
> 
> You might consider dropping back to the 1.14 + Ben Wing hacks version in
> 19.14 too.  It may be that upgrading lazy-lock is not the right thing
> to do.

But please don't make this the default.

This lazy lock is -- despite all the problems it seems to have -- the first
one where (setq lazy-lock-hide-invisible nil) actually works... And
with this XEmacs really feels much more responsive than before!

Let's investigate this shell/compile/grep stuff further but not back
out to some code broken in other areas.

I glanced through the comments at the beginning of lazy lock and I'm
just wondering if there are any plans to give it the necessary support
in XEmacs, too.

	   Jens

   

