From xemacs-m  Tue Feb 18 08:11:13 1997
Received: from steadfast.teradyne.com (steadfast.teradyne.com [131.101.1.200])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id IAA27277
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Tue, 18 Feb 1997 08:11:13 -0600 (CST)
Received: from engine.ecf.teradyne.com (engine.ecf.teradyne.com [131.101.192.6]) by steadfast.teradyne.com (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id JAA17777; Tue, 18 Feb 1997 09:14:20 -0500 (EST)
Received: from midnight.eng.ecf.teradyne.com (midnight.ecf.teradyne.com [131.101.192.49]) by engine.ecf.teradyne.com (8.7.1/8.7.1) with SMTP id PAA26990; Tue, 18 Feb 1997 15:10:32 +0100 (MET)
Received: by midnight.eng.ecf.teradyne.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id PAA02053; Tue, 18 Feb 1997 15:10:31 +0100
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Cc: Andy Norman <ange@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Subject: Re: efs lossage
References: <199702172114.AA058304072@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com> <m2iv3r9kbh.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
X-Face: 4[iHdXiTu\V3u[~\I)<f9HC);%~nG8`oUqv#uzvs6=\V{AjN6Sn
 c/qi;YLwRmEbt8Y*=j5n(urqY@chPh@J'D"QlqD!C8>*}#kYF[-tYl3VZga/HSOP|K,{L
 Rtu@f0y/=O&Cu}\:~d|P$JON?pn?j,&CnPb1z#/TL9bkAJwyol&a:SvYj-VYbM=Dtxhk9
 =w|R6U3_;SH&B<Mfy6Q%#
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.105)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: Adrian Aichner <aichner@ecf.teradyne.com>
Date: 18 Feb 1997 15:10:29 +0100
In-Reply-To: Steven L Baur's message of 17 Feb 1997 13:47:14 -0800
Message-ID: <rxsg1yub3xm.fsf@midnight.ecf.teradyne.com>
Lines: 58
X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.84/XEmacs 20.1

>>>>> "sb" == Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com> writes:

Steven,

do you have an approved efs patch for xemacs-20.1-b1 you could post
here?

I am trying to find out why
(require 'efs)
appears to be such a big load-time hit, while
(require 'efs-auto)
together with loading of efs on demand doesn't seem to get close to
that time.

Thanks,

Adrian

    sb> Andy Norman writes:
    >> Bill writes:
    >>> Try this patch.  This let binding was bad bad bad.

    >>> ! 		  (abbr (efs-relativize-filename filename))
    >>> ! 		  (temp (concat (car (efs-make-tmp-name nil host))
    >>> ! 				(or (substring abbr (string-match "\\." abbr))
    >>> "")))

    >> Where did that second binding of temp come from?  I don't see it in
    >> either my original 1.15 or in x2.

    sb> That was my fault ...

    >> ... [time passes while ange checks his archives] ...

    >> Ah, OK, an XEmacs pretesters submitted it recently.

    sb> ... I over-zealously applied unapproved patches before getting the
    sb> proper patches from Michael.

    >> Can we possibly limit changes to XEmacs' version of efs?  Perhaps
    >> make Mike Sperber the contact point (until he ducks.)

    sb> Yup.

    >> Thanks!  ;-)

    sb> Sorry about that.
    sb> -- 
    sb> steve@miranova.com baur
    sb> Unsolicited commercial e-mail will be billed at $250/message.



-- 
  Teradyne GmbH               Adrian Aichner Applications Engineer
  Semiconductor Test Group    Telephone      +49/89/418 61 (0)-208
  Dingolfinger Strasse 2      Fax            +49/89/418 61-217
  D-81673 M"UNCHEN            E-mail         aichner@ecf.teradyne.com

