From xemacs-m  Mon Feb 17 15:14:36 1997
Received: from hplb.hpl.hp.com (hplb.hpl.hp.com [15.255.59.2])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA23372
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Mon, 17 Feb 1997 15:14:35 -0600 (CST)
Received: from cuckoo.hpl.hp.com by hplb.hpl.hp.com; Mon, 17 Feb 1997 21:14:33 GMT
Received: from localhost by cuckoo.hpl.hp.com with SMTP
	(1.37.109.16/15.6+ISC) id AA058304072; Mon, 17 Feb 1997 21:14:32 GMT
Message-Id: <199702172114.AA058304072@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com>
To: wmperry@aventail.com
Cc: Neal Becker <neal@ctd.comsat.com>, xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: efs lossage 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 17 Feb 1997 12:39:05 PST."
             <199702172039.MAA21739@newman> 
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 1997 21:14:32 +0000
From: Andy Norman <ange@hplb.hpl.hp.com>

Bill writes:

>   Try this patch.  This let binding was bad bad bad.

> ! 		  (abbr (efs-relativize-filename filename))
> ! 		  (temp (concat (car (efs-make-tmp-name nil host))
> ! 				(or (substring abbr (string-match "\\." abbr))
> "")))

Where did that second binding of temp come from?  I don't see it in either my
original 1.15 or in x2.

... [time passes while ange checks his archives] ...

Ah, OK, an XEmacs pretesters submitted it recently.

Can we possibly limit changes to XEmacs' version of efs?  Perhaps make Mike
Sperber the contact point (until he ducks.)

Thanks!  ;-)

						-- ange -- <><

http://www-uk.hpl.hp.com/people/ange		ange@hplb.hpl.hp.com

