From xemacs-m  Sat Feb 15 22:33:21 1997
Received: from crystal.WonderWorks.COM (crystal.WonderWorks.com [192.203.206.1])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id WAA18173
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Sat, 15 Feb 1997 22:33:14 -0600 (CST)
Received: by crystal.WonderWorks.COM 
	id QQcdcc29982; Sat, 15 Feb 1997 23:33:13 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 1997 23:33:13 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <QQcdcc29982.199702160433@crystal.WonderWorks.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Kyle Jones <kyle_jones@wonderworks.com>
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: Is your (favorite) package not in XEmacs and should be?
In-Reply-To: <m2ohdlwh3g.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
References: <m27mkb0wip.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
	<m367zus99s.fsf@cortex.corpus.uni-muenster.de>
	<m2ohdlwh3g.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>

The undo function in undo/redo isn't compatible with the old
undo.  Motion commands don't break the undo chain.  This could
well frustrate the bejeezus out of the unsuspecting.  Before
loosing it on the masses turn it on by default in one of the
betas and see how the beta group handles the change.

