From xemacs-m  Mon Feb 10 18:47:05 1997
Received: from crystal.WonderWorks.COM (crystal.WonderWorks.com [192.203.206.1])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA16831
	for <xemacs-beta@xemacs.org>; Mon, 10 Feb 1997 18:47:03 -0600 (CST)
Received: by crystal.WonderWorks.COM 
	id QQccjb14017; Mon, 10 Feb 1997 19:47:04 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 1997 19:47:04 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <QQccjb14017.199702110047@crystal.WonderWorks.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Kyle Jones <kyle_jones@wonderworks.com>
To: xemacs-beta@xemacs.org
Subject: Re: b93 dead on arrival 
In-Reply-To: <199702102315.SAA23720@spacely.icd.teradyne.com>
References: <m2ybcwtfrh.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
	<199702102315.SAA23720@spacely.icd.teradyne.com>

Vinnie Shelton writes:
 > I'm running with last week's gcc 2.8.0 beta, labelled: ss-970202.
 > BTW, I dunno if you noticed, but I was trying to run with X11R6.3.

(chuckle) Sometimes I wonder if you guys really want XEmacs to
work...  compiling with -O6, beta compilers and the like.  But I
guess somebody's got to live on the bleeding edge.  Better you
than me, God bless you. :)

